Re: [Sugar-devel] TA Lego WeDo plugin -- review and notes

2011-09-15 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Ian Daniher wrote: > Hi All, > I missed this original thread due to a poorly configured gmail autofilter. > Martin - any interest in resuming packaging of WeDoMore? > Walter - has the plugin API solidified? It is pretty stable at this point. -walter > Best! > -

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA Lego WeDo plugin -- review and notes

2011-09-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Hi Ian, We moved our development to F14. I have a WeDo kit too, then I can help you with testing and integration to activities. Gonzalo On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Ian Daniher wrote: > Hi All, > > I missed this original thread due to a poorly configured gmail autofilter. > > Martin - any

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA Lego WeDo plugin -- review and notes

2011-09-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Ian Daniher wrote: > Martin - any interest in resuming packaging of WeDoMore? Sure! but I'm pretty busy ATM w XO-1.75 ~ so my pace might be somewhat... leisurely :-) cheers. m --  martin.langh...@gmail.com  mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC  - as

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA Lego WeDo plugin -- review and notes

2011-09-12 Thread Ian Daniher
Hi All, I missed this original thread due to a poorly configured gmail autofilter. Martin - any interest in resuming packaging of WeDoMore? Walter - has the plugin API solidified? Best! -- Ian On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:18, Walter Bender wrote: > I propose we have an irc meeting to bring ever

Re: [Sugar-devel] TA Lego WeDo plugin -- review and notes

2011-03-24 Thread Walter Bender
I propose we have an irc meeting to bring everyone together to hammer out any additional changes I should make in v107 so as to make sure all the plugin efforts are accounted for? Any preference as to when? -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] TA Lego WeDo plugin -- review and notes

2011-03-24 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Ian, [ I've shortened the CC list a bit :-) ] I like your work and I'd like to help you get this ready for inclusion in Fedora and in OLPC's builds. - There is a lego-udevrules package underway, that has a udev rule for WeDo and NXT. So it's good that you mention it in your README for people