Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build in Fedora 18

2013-11-01 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 00:34 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 12:35 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce, Write 93 now starts and runs fine. I regret and apologise that this was a false report.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build in Fedora 18

2013-10-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Great! What changed? Gonzalo On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 12:35 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce, Write 93 now starts and runs fine. Thanks Iain

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build in Fedora 18

2013-10-23 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 12:35 +0100, Iain Brown Douglas wrote: On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce, Write 93 now starts and runs fine. Thanks Iain ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-21 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 16:06 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: The Write error looks like the Abiword package do not have introspection support enabled. == Write 93 Fails to start == Anybody else using Ubuntu managed to solve the Write issue? Is Write 93 known to run in any SoaS or PC

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-21 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Should work. This is a bug. Gonzalo On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 16:06 -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: The Write error looks like the Abiword package do not have introspection support enabled. == Write 93

[Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build in Fedora 18

2013-10-20 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
Hi, @ Daniel thank you for the big improvement to sugar-build. On a PC running Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow), xfce, 3 days ago, on 17-10-2013, I attempted to build sugar-build from http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html it failed at an early stage. Now it runs well. All

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 19 October 2013 05:35, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote: Which git version and which distribution are you using? Sorry that was not in OP Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS \n \l git version 1.7.9.5 The pull trace still shows the error you noticed. Should be fixed now. Thanks.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-19 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
T On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 11:15 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 19 October 2013 05:35, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: Which git version and which distribution are you

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-19 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
The Write error looks like the Abiword package do not have introspection support enabled. Daniel, Do you plan add abiword to sugar-build (for non Fedora) or there are another solution? Anybody else using Ubuntu managed to solve the Write issue? Gonzalo On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Iain

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote: ==Fail to start== Write F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have gobject introspection typelib, not sure why :( Record Yeah, not really sure what is going on there from the trace. Someone needs to look at the code

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi, the distro doesn't matter for sugar-build these days since we are using a chroot. We should get this fixed in Fedora, if not in F19 at least in F20 (assuming it's not already fixed there). On 19 October 2013 21:06, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: The Write error looks like the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-19 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote: ==Fail to start== Write F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have gobject introspection typelib, not sure why :( Is compiled with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-19 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 19 October 2013 23:28, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: On 19 October 2013 15:04, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.comwrote: ==Fail to start== Write F19 libabiword doesn't seem to have

[Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
I tested sugar-build from http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html on a PC running xubuntu. It installed fine, without reported error. It runs nicely. Very impressed, *thank you all*. I have a problem with a few Activities. My guess is that the cause is that I am not working in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Walter Bender
My understanding is that by default, the sugar build environment is not set up to support gtk2 activities or gst-0.10. This would perhaps account for most the errors you found. Cannot comment of what seems to be broken with web activities. regards -walter On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Iain

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Actually it supports gtk2 activities too these days. On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: My understanding is that by default, the sugar build environment is not set up to support gtk2 activities or gst-0.10. This would perhaps account for most the errors

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: == N/W == Chat opens, appears to start but cannot tx #log below Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you need to make the activity shared and have someone join for it to work (?). == Fail to start == Memorise

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: This is the trace when I ran [osbuild sugar-build]$ check Fixed. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 18 October 2013 18:29, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Tuxpaint#log below I guess this contains binaries compiled on another distribution or something. You would need to rebuild on F19 (or inside the sugar-build chroot anyway). More precisely they seem to be built on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:29 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 18 October 2013 17:22, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Daniel, Thank you for such a fast response. == N/W == Chat opens, appears to start but cannot tx ... Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing sugar-build

2013-10-18 Thread Iain Brown Douglas
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 00:28 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 18 October 2013 21:28, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: Nothing bad in the log. I suppose you need to make the activity shared and have someone join for it to work (?).