Re: [Sugar-devel] What is Sugar LiveUSB

2009-09-19 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:43:53PM -0600, Douglas McClendon wrote: Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:54:30PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote: There seems to be a lack of consensus of what SoaS actually is or what it's goals (use cases) should be. I'd like to say I see your point,

[Sugar-devel] What is Sugar LiveUSB (was: Re: [IAEP] SLOBs Position on SoaS)

2009-09-18 Thread Martin Dengler
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:54:30PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote: There seems to be a lack of consensus of what SoaS actually is or what it's goals (use cases) should be. I'd like to say I see your point, but across the internet that's a dangerous thing to say in the face of the somewhat amusing

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is Sugar LiveUSB

2009-09-18 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:54:30PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote: There seems to be a lack of consensus of what SoaS actually is or what it's goals (use cases) should be. I'd like to say I see your point, but across the internet that's a dangerous thing to say in

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is Sugar LiveUSB

2009-09-18 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
I just discovered a nice feature of rawhide nightly builds http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/education/ == test F12 for dd functionality dd if=education-i386-20090917.16.iso of=/dev/sdg bs=4k 402432+0 records in 402432+0 records out

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is Sugar LiveUSB

2009-09-18 Thread Douglas McClendon
Martin Dengler wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:54:30PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote: There seems to be a lack of consensus of what SoaS actually is or what it's goals (use cases) should be. I'd like to say I see your point, but across the internet that's a dangerous thing to say in the face