I have an idea for a better Sugar Design:
Why cannot collections of ---.xo files on a USB stick be run without
installation in sugar?
Currently if one clicks on an .xo file on a USB stick in the left bottom
of the frame area (after it retracts) it installs and then runs the .xo
application.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 08:17:06AM -0800, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
> Why cannot collections of ---.xo files on a USB stick be run without
> installation in sugar?
That would be nice. In the meanwhile, a workaround:
cd /media/stick
for x in *.xo; do sugar-install-bundle $x; done
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 08:17:06AM -0800, Thomas C Gilliard wrote:
> I have an idea for a better Sugar Design:
>
> Why cannot collections of ---.xo files on a USB stick be run without
> installation in sugar?
imho, thats not good design to have two kinds of objects people need to
interact implic
Excerpts from James Cameron's message of Tue Mar 01 07:38:47 +0100 2011:
> Subject: [PATCH] sugar-install-bundle to accept multiple files
>
> Signed-off-by: James Cameron
Thanks, pushed as ada2844 [1].
> +for line in fileinput.input():
Nice trick (I didn't know about the fileinput module yet)
4 matches
Mail list logo
