Hello Sam,
Different people reported an error while building sugar-artwork packages.
The error is caused by this commit [1] which makes GTK a building
requirement for sugar-artwork, but:
a) if GTK version version is really used on building time, then the
approach used in [1] is wrong, because the
>From the tests I have done, I confirmed it is used in building time,
therefore I have reverted the patch until we can determine a better
solution.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Martin Abente <
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> Different people reported an error while bui
Sam,
I don't have rawhide installed to test, can you try adding rules for the
two new and old ways, like here:
diff --git a/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em b/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em
index 67e4e48..d14bbfb 100644
--- a/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em
+++ b/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em
@@ -221,10
If that don't work, should be good test:
diff --git a/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em b/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em
index 67e4e48..af87900 100644
--- a/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em
+++ b/gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em
@@ -221,9 +221,18 @@ column-header .button:hover:active {
border-width: 0px
Hi Gonzalo,
Testing without your patch it appears that the journal background didn't
get broken - so most of the breakage must have been fixed later in the Gtk+
3.17 cycle!
Using your patch (the 1st one), it fixes the log tree view and the journal
still works fine. I will send a patch.
Next tim
Great!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Sam P. wrote:
> Hi Gonzalo,
>
> Testing without your patch it appears that the journal background didn't
> get broken - so most of the breakage must have been fixed later in the Gtk+
> 3.17 cycle!
>
> Using your patch (the 1st one), it fixes the log tree vi
Patch: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/pull/67
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:15 PM Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Great!
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Sam P. wrote:
>
>> Hi Gonzalo,
>>
>> Testing without your patch it appears that the journal background didn't
>> get broken - so most of t
Martin,
Are you ok with this new patch?
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Sam P. wrote:
> Patch: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/pull/67
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:15 PM Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
>
>> Great!
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Sam P. wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gonza
Will check today! Thanks Gonzalo and Sam!
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Gonzalo Odiard
wrote:
> Martin,
> Are you ok with this new patch?
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Sam P. wrote:
>
>> Patch: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/pull/67
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at
Hello Sam, Gonzalo,
Now the new patch breaks it for Ubuntu 14.04, so I sent a new PR [1] which
doesn't break it (see my patch comment), please check it that works in
newer Fedora versions.
Regards,
Martin.
Refs:
1. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork/pull/68
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 A
10 matches
Mail list logo
