Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread German Ruiz
Daniel and list, upower was not included in the build, so, by adding this package with: [custom_packages] add_packages=upower the battery indicator is now back on sugar :) Thanks... 2011/8/2 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org On 2 August 2011 23:01, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi: I

Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, German Ruiz germa...@opensuse.org.niwrote: Daniel and list, upower was not included in the build, so, by adding this package with: [custom_packages] add_packages=upower the battery indicator is now back on sugar :) Not sure why as the sugar packages have

Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requirement. Looks like an issue with OLPC's forked sugar package, where this dependency isn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-03 Thread Daniel Drake
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure why as the sugar packages have upower as a requirement. Looks like an issue with OLPC's forked sugar package, where this dependency isn't present. (the fork just removes the keyboard and software updater dialogs

[Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-02 Thread German Ruiz
Hello List I'm trying to create an olpc image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5 with some customization like (no gnome, new bootanim, adobe flash, extra activities, etc...), but i have one problem, when i disable the option for gnome desktop enviroment, the battery indicator is missing[0], i'm using the

Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-02 Thread Jerry Vonau
Hi: I haven't tried to remove gnome, but the one difference is the battery applet rpm(batti) is being asked to be installed on the image in modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc, which is no longer being included. Sounds like batti should be in a kspkglist file in modules/powered if sugar needs

Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-02 Thread James Cameron
I really don't think batti is used by Sugar. Maybe something that batti depended on was needed. German, check the logs? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] battery indicator missing on customized image based on 11.2.0 for XO 1.5

2011-08-02 Thread Daniel Drake
On 2 August 2011 23:01, Jerry Vonau jvo...@shaw.ca wrote: Hi: I haven't tried to remove gnome, but the one difference is the battery applet rpm(batti) is being asked to be installed on the image in modules/gnome/kspkglist.50.gnome.inc, which is no longer being included. Batti isn't used by