Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-22 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: > On 21 Jan 2009, at 01:01, Gary C Martin wrote: > >> On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >>> Gary C Martin wrote: On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe > wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-22 Thread Mikus Grinbergs
> Write-61 (G1G1 is at 60) - No .xo bundle provided used git to get > Browse-103 (G1G1 is at 101) - No .xo bundle provided used git to get Please remember those "out there" who are not using 'git'. .xo bundles should be available for persons using only 'wget'. Thanks, mikus

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-22 Thread Gary C Martin
On 21 Jan 2009, at 01:01, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> Gary C Martin wrote: >>> On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampi

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Gary C Martin
On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Gary C Martin wrote: >> On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe >>> wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: > Issues: We do not have a don't sav

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: > On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you resume by def

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: > >> On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer >> dependencies that are only in Intrepid. > Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread David Farning
Sascha, The best person for this type of information would be alsroot (Alesksey Lim). He has been doing a lot of good work porting Sugar to different distributions. His jhconvert work also seems interesting:) david On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 a

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 16:45, Simon Wood wrote: > Is it documented somewhere what to use on Jaunty? > > I've just downloaded Alpha3 and expected to use this for testing the lastest > Sugar, and hopefully squashing some bugs. Awesome, can you try the following? cd ~/sugar-jhbuild cp config/sysd

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Simon Wood
Is it documented somewhere what to use on Jaunty? I've just downloaded Alpha3 and expected to use this for testing the lastest Sugar, and hopefully squashing some bugs. Simon. On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:40:46 +0200 Morgan Collett wrote: > On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, d

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 19:03, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> After talking for some time with Simon, we have agreed on requesting >> input from people willing to install the last code and giving it a >> try. > > I'd like to, but still have

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 13:48, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: > >> On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer >> dependencies that are only in Intrepid. > > Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a list of

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 17:07, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >>> Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes optio

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer dependencies that are only in Intrepid. Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a list of dependencies including versions. "sugar-jhbuild build" comple

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-19 Thread Morgan Collett
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 20:03, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> After talking for some time with Simon, we have agreed on requesting >> input from people willing to install the last code and giving it a >> try. > > I'd like to, but still have

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-18 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 04:30:51PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: After talking for some time with Simon, we have agreed on requesting input from people willing to install the last code and giving it a try. I'd like to, but still haven't got the sugar-jhbuild installation to work, neither on Debian

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Gary C Martin
On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe > wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: >> >>> Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you >>> resume by >>> default you could overwrite somethi

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: > >> Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you resume by >> default you could overwrite something you needed. So we loose the undo >> functionality. > > Tha

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you resume by default you could overwrite something you needed. So we loose the undo functionality. That sounds _REALLY_ bad. I remember looking at some versioning pro

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Simon Schampijer
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > one more issue we should discuss is a modification that came in last > week by which the favorites view in the home view displays the last > entries for each activity and allows easy resuming. See Eben's designs > in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Activity_Manageme

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > one more issue we should discuss is a modification that came in last > week by which the favorites view in the home view displays the last > entries for each activity and allows easy resuming. See Eben's designs > in http://wiki.laptop

[Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, one more issue we should discuss is a modification that came in last week by which the favorites view in the home view displays the last entries for each activity and allows easy resuming. See Eben's designs in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Designs/Activity_Management . We are unsure about how ma