[Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2009-12-31 Thread Bryan Berry
I want to discuss some issues for managing Karma lessons on glso. Please let it be clear that I am not criticizing the infrastructure team __at_all__. I think they are doing a great job. The issues I am encountering have to do with underlying tools and some issues specific to developers working in

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-01 Thread Wade Brainerd
This sounds like the ideal conditions for Git. Just set up a server at your office using any Git related software you want, like Gitorious or even GitWeb. Developers set their projects up on your local server, and when they reach some level of stability they create public repositories on git.suga

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-01 Thread Bryan Berry
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > This sounds like the ideal conditions for Git. > > Just set up a server at your office using any Git related software you > want, like Gitorious or even GitWeb. Developers set their projects up > on your local server, and when they reach som

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 03:50, Bryan Berry wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: >> >> This sounds like the ideal conditions for Git. >> >> Just set up a server at your office using any Git related software you >> want, like Gitorious or even GitWeb.  Developers set their p

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-02 Thread Wade Brainerd
How badly do you need a user friendly repository creator like Gitorious? If it's not important, you can just use GitWeb which is trivial to set up. I guess the important thing to consider is that Git can handle distributing and merging *code* changes across as many servers as you want. But if yo

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Sorry it took some time to answer this thread. I'm still recovering from a new year's eve in Times Square :-) On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 12:01 -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > How badly do you need a user friendly repository creator like > Gitorious? > > If it's not important, you can just use GitWeb wh

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-02 Thread Bryan Berry
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > Sorry it took some time to answer this thread. I'm still recovering from > a new year's eve in Times Square :-) np, hope you had a great time! > The problem with managing many repositories by hand is not just setting > them up. Once y

Re: [Sugar-devel] g.sl.o issues for Karma and perhaps other activities

2010-01-03 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 08:29 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote: > > I am wary of experimenting when the gslo infrastructure is still in > flux. I would rather stick w/ gitweb or cgit and then move to whatever > becomes of gslo. Should we start w/ cgit or gitweb? > An alternative to installing a local mul