Re: [Sugar-devel] Hulahop Support

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Drake
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Daniel Castelo wrote: > Hi. In Uruguay we use the program JClic, one of the componentes of this > program required hulahop. > > Do you know if the library has support now? I know that the new Sugar > Browser is based on Webkit. Unfortunately its unsupported - a de

[Sugar-devel] Hulahop Support

2012-10-01 Thread Daniel Castelo
Hi. In Uruguay we use the program JClic, one of the componentes of this program required hulahop. Do you know if the library has support now? I know that the new Sugar Browser is based on Webkit. Regards, Daniel -- Ing. Daniel Castelo Plan Ceibal - Área Técnica Avda. Italia 6201 Montevideo - U

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop

2010-05-31 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 01:51, Lucian Branescu wrote: > Yes, you can access the DOM from python. Google for extra info. If you > can't find anything, I did something similar in my last year's > project, which you can find here > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/lucians-ssb/trees/mast

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop

2010-05-29 Thread Lucian Branescu
Yes, you can access the DOM from python. Google for extra info. If you can't find anything, I did something similar in my last year's project, which you can find here http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/browse/repos/lucians-ssb/trees/master Look at usercode.py On 29 May 2010 11:26, Stefan George w

[Sugar-devel] hulahop

2010-05-29 Thread Stefan George
Hi, I would like to load a Website into the WebView(). This Website has some Javascript that manipulates the dom after loading the website. Do I get this manipulated dom If I get the dom wv.get_dom_window() to proceed it with python? Would that be possible? My Idea is

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop autotools seems broken

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:07, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:43:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> The autotools shipped with hulahop 0.4.9 seems broken. >> >>Hi,

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop autotools seems broken

2009-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:43:19AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> The autotools shipped with hulahop 0.4.9 seems broken. > >Hi, have entered this ticket about it: > >http://dev.sugarlabs.org/t

Re: [Sugar-devel] hulahop autotools seems broken

2009-06-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:20, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > Hi, > > The autotools shipped with hulahop 0.4.9 seems broken. Hi, have entered this ticket about it: http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/936 Do you have already a patch for this? If so,

[Sugar-devel] hulahop autotools seems broken

2009-05-30 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Hi, The autotools shipped with hulahop 0.4.9 seems broken. * The option --disable-maintainer-mode is unsupported * libtool fails, seemingly treating compile flags as build options I have worked around it for now in the Debian packaging by r

[Sugar-devel] Hulahop moved to git.sugarlabs.org

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
No pootle changes necessary for this module. Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel