[Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, any opinions on this? Thanks, Tomeu On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 18:44, SugarLabs Bugs wrote: > #1042: cannot install new activity version > --+- >    Reporter:  sascha_silbe               |          Owner:  tomeu >        T

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso : > Hi, > > any opinions on this? I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at once. The argument I saw for this case was that different versions might have incompatibilities in their collaboration protocols, but I feel that we should instead stick to standard

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso : > > Hi, > > > > any opinions on this? > > I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at > once. The argument I saw for this case was that different versions > might have incompatibilities in thei

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 17:48, Martin Dengler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso : >> > Hi, >> > >> > any opinions on this? >> >> I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at >> once. The argument I saw for this case was t

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
Martin Dengler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >> 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso : >>> Hi, >>> >>> any opinions on this? >> I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at >> once. The argument I saw for this case was that different versions >> might have

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Eben Eliason
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Martin Dengler wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:26:58PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: >>> 2009/8/10 Tomeu Vizoso : Hi, any opinions on this? >>> I dislike the idea of having multiple versions installed at >>> once. The

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : > Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps?  Like, we're under a tree > and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try > but not commit to blowing-away your "official" version... Do we have the relevant tools/interfaces/activities to make this pos

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:09:06PM +0545, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : > > Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps?  Like, we're under a tree > > and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try > > but not commit to blowing-away your "official" version...

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : > Do you propose SL explictly not support this (closing the bug as > WONTFIX or something, presumably) and - separately - let it be a > goal/feature request once there are sponsors?  That seems sensible to > me. I'm a bit confused as to the current situation. The bug see

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Gabriel Eirea
> I think I agree with both Ben and Tomeu, here. Supporting multiple > activity versions is crucial to allowing kids to modify activities, or > create their own. At the same time, I also believe that a new owner > (as in the example of modifying the Speak activity under a tree) > should result in a

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-10 Thread Gary C Martin
On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: > 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : >> Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps? Like, we're under a >> tree >> and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try >> but not commit to blowing-away your "official" version... > > Do we ha

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-11 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 03:24, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: > >> 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : >>> Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps?  Like, we're under a >>> tree >>> and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to try >>> but not comm

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-13 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:24:46AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: > On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : > >> Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps? Like, we're under a > >> tree > >> and here's my patched Terminal/Pippy/Speak that you may want to tr

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-13 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 03:51:43PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 02:24:46AM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote: > > On 10 Aug 2009, at 17:24, Daniel Drake wrote: > > > > > 2009/8/10 Martin Dengler : > > >> Learner-generated activity patches, perhaps? Like, we're under a > > >> tre

Re: [Sugar-devel] multiple activity versions installed simultaneously (was Re: [Bugs] #1042 UNSP: cannot install new activity version)

2009-08-17 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/8/11 Gary C Martin : >> What are the user interfaces like when dealing with multiple >> activities? > > Well, we have this already, it's called the Journal. Just download Activity > bundles and they all live there (and have done as far back as I can > recall)... > >> If I click on a new versio