Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:15, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) wrote: >> The only problem I see is that the same name is used to denominate a >> community project and a private initiative. These are two different >> things but not different enough to avoid confusion. >> >> I'm not talking right now abou

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-18 Thread Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
> The only problem I see is that the same name is used to denominate a > community project and a private initiative. These are two different > things but not different enough to avoid confusion. > > I'm not talking right now about name ownership, that's why I listed as > a possible solution that th

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 00:10, Bill Bogstad wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Sorry about top posting, but I agree with most of what you said below, >> and I'm not yet particularly worried about the content of the site >> itself for now. >> >> I really think that y

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-17 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
I agree "Sugar on a Stick" should be only the Fedora based sh script installed USB and SD software that sugarlabs produces. I am calling other variants (except for Strawberry or "Blueberry") "Sugar Desktop on a Stick" to distinguish them. these are "full install" (Anaconda and maybe zyx-liveins

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-17 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Sorry about top posting, but I agree with most of what you said below, > and I'm not yet particularly worried about the content of the site > itself for now. > > I really think that your initiative has big future and understand that > it's st

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-17 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Sorry about top posting, but I agree with most of what you said below, and I'm not yet particularly worried about the content of the site itself for now. I really think that your initiative has big future and understand that it's still in an early stage. I also think that something like that could

[Sugar-devel] sugaronastick.com (was Re: Beta Test of Sugar on a Stick Backup Service.)

2009-09-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 20:04, Caroline Meeks wrote: > I'd like to announce to just the sugar development list at this point. > We are ready for the first tests of backup and restore on a Sugar Stick.  We > will be using this code for both Sugaronastick.com and the GPA but each will > point to a d