Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-19 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:48:45PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: ... > > > >I'm looking at your packages, but the only change I found is in > >changelog, or I am wrong? > > > >Anyway, I've added DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += nostrip and yeah, it seems to > >work. I'll upload it to debian. > > Using nostr

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-18 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:31:18PM +0200, s.bouta...@free.fr wrote: >Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > >> Packaged a working hippo-canvas for both amd64 and i386, both Sid and >> Squeeze now. >> >> Add one of these lines as appropriate for your Debian syst

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-18 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 21:48, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:34:28PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: >>Hi, Jonas. >> >>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>... >>> >Yeah - that bug was ca

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-17 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:34:28PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: >Hi, Jonas. > >On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >... >> >Yeah - that bug was causing the segfault I wrote about in another >> >thread! >> > >> >Ma

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread Santiago Ruano Rincón
Hi, Jonas. On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: ... > >Yeah - that bug was causing the segfault I wrote about in another > >thread! > > > >Martin Stone figured out a workaround (and I have now mentioned the > >bugnumber next to it!) of not stripping binaries in hippo-

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread s . boutayeb
Selon Jonas Smedegaard : > Packaged a working hippo-canvas for both amd64 and i386, both Sid and > Squeeze now. > > Add one of these lines as appropriate for your Debian system: > > deb http://debian.jones.dk/ sid sugar > deb http://debian.jones.dk/ squeeze sugar > > > This should make 0.84 work f

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:01:25PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:04:50AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wr

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:45:41AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:15:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>>just installed squeeze and sugar-0.84. Which options have users

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:30:19AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:04:50AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> So far I have almost only played with sugar-emulator (too la

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:04:50AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> So far I have almost only played with sugar-emulator (too lazy to >> quit my many xterminals) but I believe the GDM session shou

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:15:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>just installed squeeze and sugar-0.84. Which options have users to run >>Sugar? Should we expect them to use a display manag

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 02:43, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:15:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>just installed squeeze and sugar-0.84. Which options have users to run >>Sugar? Should we expect them to use a display manag

Re: [Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-15 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 04:15:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >just installed squeeze and sugar-0.84. Which options have users to run >Sugar? Should we expect them to use a display manager? For now, the package sugar-0.84 provides the following way

[Sugar-devel] testing sugar on debian

2009-07-15 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Jonas, just installed squeeze and sugar-0.84. Which options have users to run Sugar? Should we expect them to use a display manager? Just ran startx and in xterm, 'sugar', it complained about not being able to import wnck, though python-wnck is installed. This doesn't seem to be related to Sug