Aleksey wrote:
> yeah, in my testing environment I have remains from previous 0install
> sessions
>
> I've pushed new commits with fixed these issues and added cancel button
Aleksey,
Your test case passes on my system with these additional commits.
Nice work,
Michael
_
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:01:07PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Aleksey wrote:
>
> > To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
> > I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
> > in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit clone
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:49PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
> > > Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry
> > > or town with internet a
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22:23PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
> > Example: Teacher travels from a remote village to an education ministry or
> > town with internet access once a month. Downloads a selection of new
> > activities and
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:05:21PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> >> - Why is the depcheck happening at "first start" time? Install time
> >> seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of
> >> software, needed deps can be gr
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:06:19PM +, Gary C Martin wrote:
> Hi Aleksey,
>
> On 23 Nov 2009, at 18:45, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim
> >> wrote:
> >>> I've changed this feature a bi
Hi Aleksey,
On 23 Nov 2009, at 18:45, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>>> I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]
>>
>> Good to see progress on this. Mu
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> - Why is the depcheck happening at "first start" time? Install time
>> seems be more appropriate: install time means there is a src of
>> software, needed deps can be grabbed from the same src if present...
>
> in that case we entirely depend
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:39:14PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]
>
> Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions...
>
> - Why is the depcheck ha
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> I've changed this feature a bit, so now its a Zero Install integration[4]
Good to see progress on this. Much appreciated. Some questions...
- Why is the depcheck happening at "first start" time? Install time
seems be more appropriate: instal
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:51:27AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
> I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
> in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
> repos[2] an
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:10:11PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:51, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
> > I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
> > in sugar[1]. To check
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 06:51, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> To have some implementation mockups for next 0install debates,
> I've coded how(I'm thinking) 0install integration could be implemented
> in sugar[1]. To check existed code, pull sugar and sugar-toolkit cloned
> repos[2] and follow si
13 matches
Mail list logo