Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-23 Thread Wade Brainerd
Hey Chris, On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:13 PM, chm wrote: > I've built a wacom tablet kernel driver > for 10.1.3beta and have been able to run > Colors! with a Wacom Bamboo Fun tablet. > This was the first time since leaving > os802 on the XO-1. Yippee! > Wonderful! I wonder if OLPC would be up

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-23 Thread chm
On 12/23/2010 11:58 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > Hey Chris, > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:13 PM, chm wrote: > > I've built a wacom tablet kernel driver for > 10.1.3beta and have been able to run Colors! with > a Wacom Bamboo Fun tablet. This was the first > time since leaving os802

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-23 Thread chm
On 12/23/2010 3:11 PM, chm wrote: On 12/23/2010 11:58 AM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:13 PM, chm wrote: > > I notice some problems with a solid, > full-pressure/full-size dot at the beginning of > a stroke. That was fixed previously by some of > the tablet driver sett

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-25 Thread chm
On 12/23/2010 6:41 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: Yikes, can you tell me what isn't there? > ... > Just to check, does your version have a Help button in the toolbar? > That would indicate that it's the most recent one that I made. I just checked and the Colors-15 I have has neither the Help button

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-25 Thread chm
I just tried Colors-13.xo (from the OLPC site) but it failed to load because it could not find python2.5 libraries. I'm not surprised at that, just hoping Merry Christmas, Chris On 12/25/2010 9:21 AM, chm wrote: On 12/23/2010 6:41 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: Yikes, can you tell me what isn

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-26 Thread Wade Brainerd
Looks like I tagged v16 in Git last January, but somehow it never made it to ASLO. I'll take care of that now!! On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 9:54 AM, chm wrote: > I just tried Colors-13.xo (from the OLPC > site) but it failed to load because it > could not find python2.5 libraries.  I'm > not surpris

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-26 Thread chm
Looking forward to it. I tried running make in the git directory but had some missing compiler components and yum died after some bad checksums from one of the olpc f11 repositories and I don't know enough to know if it is a temporary network problem or other. While you are preparing another rel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-27 Thread chm
On 12/26/2010 8:48 PM, chm wrote: > Looking forward to it. I tried running make in the git directory but had some missing compiler components and yum died after some bad checksums from one of the olpc f11 repositories and I don't know enough to know if it is a temporary network problem or other.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-27 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 08:48:19PM -0500, chm wrote: > (4) The new resume by default with Sugar 0.88 > on 10.1.3 is problematic because it is > difficult to keep and find (or whatever) > a previous drawing. That's Sugar 0.84, not 0.88. It has been that way since the start of the 10.1

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-27 Thread chm
On 12/27/2010 5:59 PM, James Cameron wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 08:48:19PM -0500, chm wrote: (4) The new resume by default with Sugar 0.88 on 10.1.3 is problematic because it is difficult to keep and find (or whatever) a previous drawing. That's Sugar 0.84, not 0.88. It has

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-27 Thread Walter Bender
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:23 PM, chm wrote: > On 12/27/2010 5:59 PM, James Cameron wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 08:48:19PM -0500, chm wrote: >> >>> (4) The new resume by default with Sugar 0.88 >>> on 10.1.3 is problematic because it is >>> difficult to keep and find (or whatever)

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-31 Thread chm
On 12/23/2010 9:57 PM, chm wrote: On 12/23/2010 6:41 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:11 PM, chm wrote: > > Great. I have an idea, how about we apply for a OLPC > developers program project with "get Wacom tablets > and Colors! working on XO 1.5"? I have a number of > ac

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2010-12-31 Thread chm
On 12/31/2010 2:45 PM, chm wrote: On 12/23/2010 9:57 PM, chm wrote: On 12/23/2010 6:41 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:11 PM, chm wrote: > > Great. I have an idea, how about we apply for a OLPC > developers program project with "get Wacom tablets > and Colors! working on XO

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2011-01-02 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:45:02PM -0500, chm wrote: > How do we start the process to join the OLPC > developers program? http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Contributors_program - fill out a form carefully, if you have any questions ask here on sugar-devel@ or de...@lists.laptop.org - mail it to contri

Re: [Sugar-devel] Colors! Activity status

2011-01-08 Thread chm
Hi Wade- I was wondering how the Colors! v16 release was coming along? Now that os860 is available I'll build the linuxwacom against that version and send you the update so maybe the Colors-16 could be available for the official 10.1.3 release. Cheers, Chris On 12/26/2010 11:22 AM, Wade Braine