Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-28 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On Fri, 28.02.2014 19:41, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann wrote: In this respect I wrote before, that I do not think that Lego is in control over its registered trademark 'LEGO' anymore, This has nothing to do with Sugar, nor OLPC. Perhaps a maili

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-28 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > In this respect I wrote before, that I do not think that Lego is in control > over its registered trademark 'LEGO' anymore, This has nothing to do with Sugar, nor OLPC. Perhaps a mailing list about trademarks is more appropriate (hin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-28 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Samuel: Im sorry to say, but I wished nothing in this respect, like discussing legal issues with somebody or reaching an agreement with Sugar Labs, because the Sugar learning software is licensed under the GPL. I only sent an e-mail to this mailing list, because Daniel Narvaez started this t

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-28 Thread Christian Stroetmann
At this point I would like to mention some last words and then stop sending e-mails to this thread. I am sorry to say that I could not tell you and others what I really wanted to say. Maybe, it was due to a language barrier on my side. Ich kann auch in Deutsch schreiben, falls es so leichter f

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Sean DALY
WIPO's Romarin database contradicts you regarding the LEGO mark. LEGO vigorously defend infringement of their marks ( http://aboutus.lego.com/en-gb/legal-notice/fair-play). Sean On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christian Stroetmann < stroetm...@ontolab.com> wrote: > On Thu, 27.02.2014 01:13,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Samuel Greenfeld
Christian: This is an email mailing list primarily made of volunteers. To the best of my knowledge no one involved with this email thread so far (including me) is authorized to act on their own on behalf of Sugar Labs or OLPC. Likewise, no individual you are speaking with likely can legally bind

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Hello Paul You wrote: james wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:55:36AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > > For sure, there is the One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) respectively One > > Pad Per Child (OPPC) project by my business division intellitablet > > since July 2012 (see [1]).

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Bastien
All this is completely off-topic on this list and I'm personally done with the good laugh I had, so I suggest we move to something else. Thanks, -- Bastien ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinf

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Hi Lionel 2014-02-27 9:29 GMT+01:00 Christian Stroetmann >: Nevertheless, it was meant as a place holder and an idea contributer, if the company LEGO would be interested in such a One LEGO Laptop Per Child (TM) device on the one hand and on the other

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Lionel Laské
2014-02-27 9:29 GMT+01:00 Christian Stroetmann : > > Nevertheless, it was meant as a place holder and an idea contributer, if > the company LEGO would be interested in such a One LEGO Laptop Per Child > (TM) device on the one hand and on the other hand a mark that my company > publicated the concep

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On Thu, 27.02.2014 01:13, Bastien wrote: Christian Stroetmann writes: For sure, there is the One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) respectively One Pad Per Child (OPPC) project by my business division intellitablet since July 2012 (see [1]). A trademark is not just about adding (TM) after a bunch of ot

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On Thu, 27.02.2014 00:57, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:40:34AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Fe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Paul Fox
james wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:55:36AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > > For sure, there is the One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) respectively One > > Pad Per Child (OPPC) project by my business division intellitablet > > since July 2012 (see [1]). > > You are contracted by OLPC? So,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:55:36AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > For sure, there is the One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) respectively One > Pad Per Child (OPPC) project by my business division intellitablet > since July 2012 (see [1]). > You are contracted by OLPC? So, please could you take a loo

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Bastien
Christian Stroetmann writes: > For sure, there is the One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) respectively One > Pad Per Child (OPPC) project by my business division intellitablet > since July 2012 (see [1]). A trademark is not just about adding (TM) after a bunch of other trademarks. I doubt you officiall

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On Thu, 27.02.2014 00:45, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:33:05AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On Wed 26.02.2014 23:03, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:40:34AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: > > >On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > >>On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: > >>>On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:02:36PM +0100, Christ

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:33:05AM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > On Wed 26.02.2014 23:03, James Cameron wrote: > > >On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > >>On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: > >>>On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:02:36PM +0100, Christi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:02:36PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: The One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) project is very well known

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On Wed 26.02.2014 23:03, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:02:36PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: The One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) project is very well known b

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:33:52PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:02:36PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > >>The One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) project is very well known by the OLPC > >>headquarter as the XO-1 with

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
On Wed, 26.02.2014 22:30, James Cameron wrote: On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:02:36PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: The One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) project is very well known by the OLPC headquarter as the XO-1 with touchscreen is. The XO-1 never had a touchscreen, and I'm not aware of any OTP

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:02:36PM +0100, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > The One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) project is very well known by the OLPC > headquarter as the XO-1 with touchscreen is. The XO-1 never had a touchscreen, and I'm not aware of any OTPC project. -- James Cameron http://quozl.lin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Bonjour Lionel The status of the project is that for example you can directly put your Sugar Web on it, if you have a sound software architecture, or said in other words, if you have not used JS libraries that are specific to a web browser engine, though in general I have not seen such a libra

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Lionel Laské
Hi Christian, 2014-02-26 16:33 GMT+01:00 : > > > I would like to inform you all about the following points: > 1. We have registered our project Sugarfox (TM), publicated on the 9th > of October 2013 ([1]), at Mozilla Firefox OS and its related marketplace > with the creation of a partner account f

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
A little correction: Boot to Web (B2W) Boot to WebKit (B2WK) Sorry for the confusion. Best regards Christian Stroetmann Aloha I would like to inform you all about the following points: 1. We have registered our project Sugarfox (TM), publicated on the 9th of October 2013 ([1]), at Mozilla

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Am 26.02.2014 16:30, schrieb Christian Stroetmann: Aloha I would like to inform you all about the following points: 1. We have registered our project Sugarfox (TM), publicated on the 9th of October 2013 ([1]), at Mozilla Firefox OS and its related marketplace with the creation of a partner acc

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-26 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Aloha I would like to inform you all about the following points: 1. We have registered our project Sugarfox (TM), publicated on the 9th of October 2013 ([1]), at Mozilla Firefox OS and its related marketplace with the creation of a partner account for our company with the following short descr

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-25 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2014-02-25 18:56 GMT-03:00 Daniel Narvaez : > This is a very interesting development as a possible base platform for a > future fully html based Sugar. B2G always felt like the perfect platform for > it, if not because it wouldn't (fully) work on a normal Linux distro. Interesting Daniel, thanks.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-25 Thread James Cameron
I agree, it has potential. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel