On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 06:07, Walter Bender wrote:
>
> I think we are looking at a great probortunity here. We have a project
My mind balks at that word, but I agree with this message wholeheartedly.
> If we are able to learn to make succe
ary 2010 9:41 a.m.
>> To: Bernie Innocenti
>> Cc: Walter Bender; carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
>> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
>>
>> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie Innocenti
010 9:41 a.m.
> To: Bernie Innocenti
> Cc: Walter Bender; carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
>
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote
...@codewiz.org]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 January 2010 9:41 a.m.
To: Bernie Innocenti
Cc: Walter Bender; carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie
y, 13 January 2010 7:17 a.m.
To: Bernie Innocenti
Cc: carol...@solutiongrove.com; Jim Simmons; David Leeming;
sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; Daniel J. Clark
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500,
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 16:36 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Installing an updated kernel on SoaS may be a little hard.
Oops:
bernie: the new kernel might be a better bet also
bernie: from koji for F12
Well, maybe not too hard after all. Try:
sudo yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ker
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 15:27 -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Caroline, I believe you could install it on SoaS by doing:
>
> sudo yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xorg-x11-drv-ati
>
> It should drag in a few more testing packages, that's to be expected.
> Good luck!
I got more useful tips
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 15:16 -0500, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> >> I second what Jim says. I've had a lot of trouble booting from the
> >> boot helper with Blueberry.
> >>
> >> Berni
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote:
>> I second what Jim says. I've had a lot of trouble booting from the
>> boot helper with Blueberry.
>>
>> Bernie looked at this at the GPA and found a bug in Fedora related to
>> vi
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:36 -0500, Caroline Meeks wrote:
> I second what Jim says. I've had a lot of trouble booting from the
> boot helper with Blueberry.
>
> Bernie looked at this at the GPA and found a bug in Fedora related to
> video drivers. Bernie, was this bug reported?
I think I may h
m
-Original Message-
From: Wade Brainerd [mailto:wad...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 12 January 2010 4:05 a.m.
To: David Leeming
Cc: Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
Hi David,
Did you try adding 'selinux=0' to the kernel boot parameters?
Does SoaS Strawberry *not* expect selinux to be disabled?
IOW, is this a difference between Strawberry and Blueberry?
Art Hunkins
- Original Message -
From: "Wade Brainerd"
To: "David Leeming"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Sugar-de
wnload.
I have had good success booting Blueberry directly from the USB, but
only a couple of the computers I own can do it.
I was able to boot Strawberry using its helper CD, and I can also boot
the Fedora 12 Live CD with no problem.
James Simmons
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:12:58 +0100
> From: T
Hi David,
Did you try adding 'selinux=0' to the kernel boot parameters? SoaS
Blueberry expects selinux to be disabled, so it sounds like the image
you're using was created incorrectly.
1. When first booting, press a key when it prompts you to.
2. You should see a 'GNU GRUB' screen. Press the e
> James Simmons
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:12:58 +0100
> > From: Tomeu Vizoso
> > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2 problems
> > To: David Leeming
> > Cc: Sugar on a Stick List , Sugar-devel
> >
> > Message-ID:
> ><2428
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 17:25, Art Hunkins wrote:
> Your byte count is the same as mine, and I've no problems.
>
> I use the Live USB Creator as well on WinXP.
>
> I second Tomeu's suggestion about checksum..
If Live USB Creator is already checking the checksum, then there's no
point in doing it
Your byte count is the same as mine, and I've no problems.
I use the Live USB Creator as well on WinXP.
I second Tomeu's suggestion about checksum..
Art Hunkins
- Original Message -
From: David Leeming
To: Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 12:21 AM
from the USB, but
only a couple of the computers I own can do it.
I was able to boot Strawberry using its helper CD, and I can also boot
the Fedora 12 Live CD with no problem.
James Simmons
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:12:58 +0100
> From: Tomeu Vizoso
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 2
Hi David,
the most practical way of making sure that your download isn't
corrupted is to verify the checksum:
http://techcityinc.com/2009/02/06/calculate-md5-and-sha1-on-windows/
The SHA-1 checksum of the file should be the one in this file:
http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/releases/SHA1SUM
19 matches
Mail list logo
