Hi, Walter
Thanks for this. I feel at long last the community may actually get
involved in a serious discussion about what we are about and what we
need to do.
Discussion about whether to support Trisquel or Raspberry Pi or Windows
is a distraction. The fundamental requirement is that Sugar
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks Walter. I'd like to better understand some additional context
> before diving in :)
>
> Does this mean Sameer you have stopped the project planning process you
> started, and we should not expect you to restart
Hi
Thanks Walter. I'd like to better understand some additional context before
diving in :)
Does this mean Sameer you have stopped the project planning process you
started, and we should not expect you to restart it again?
Walter, are these the goals for this year, or are they your proposal for
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Lionel Laské wrote:
> Hi Walter,
>
> Thanks a lot for this long proposal. Great to hear you on that.
> I think that it's more a Sugar history than a goal/vision but it's good to
> read it from a guy that was the major contributor of the
Hi Walter,
Thanks a lot for this long proposal. Great to hear you on that.
I think that it's more a Sugar history than a goal/vision but it's good to
read it from a guy that was the major contributor of the history.
BTW I'm not agree with your goals.
My view is that it's not a good idea to limit
As per the discussion in the last Suagr Labs Oversight Board Meeting, I had
agreed to write a draft statement of goals for 2017. The document below
includes feedback from Samson G. I hope this document can serve to
revitalize our discussion from 2016 that never reached resolution.
Sugar Labs
6 matches
Mail list logo