Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

Hi, Dave I appreciate the attempt to discuss this issue. My take is that James is reflecting his view that there is no difference between Sugar and a Sugar activity - they all get built together. I am ignorant of the benefit of using Debian or Fedora packaging. The xo bundle is a zip file

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

Thanks for your questions, Dave. On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:50:54PM -0400, Dave Crossland wrote: > On 25 May 2018 at 00:47, Tony Anderson wrote: > > ASLO provides access to Sugar activities (*.xo bundles). Ways in which > users get Sugar is not relevant. > > When

Re: [Sugar-devel] ASLO shut down target date? (was: licensing question)

On 25 May 2018 at 00:47, Tony Anderson wrote: > ASLO provides access to Sugar activities (*.xo bundles). Ways in which > users get Sugar is not relevant. When James said, "plenty of disk space these days to include all working activities in a build", that suggested to me