Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugarizer flatpak package

I am not familiar with this approach. How would the user install a flatpack version on his computer. Would it need to be a Linux distribution or could it be Windows 10 or MacOS? How would the user access the installed Sugar - launch as an application in his os or reboot / chroot as we do

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugarizer flatpak package

Great! I have thinking for a while about do the same with Sugar itself. Flatpak looks like a good technology to distribute the project. Gonzalo On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on a flatpak package for Sugarizer. > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugarizer flatpak package

2017-04-14 2:00 GMT-03:00 Tony Anderson : > I apparently misunderstood. I had thought you were working on Sugar. Does > this address any current problem with installing Sugarizer? > Does this flatpak option apply to Sugar? No Tony, just Sugarizer. > On 04/14/2017 12:51 PM,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugarizer flatpak package

I apparently misunderstood. I had thought you were working on Sugar. Does this address any current problem with installing Sugarizer? Does this flatpak option apply to Sugar? Tony On 04/14/2017 12:51 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi Great work :) On Apr 13, 2017 12:41 PM, "Manuel Quiñones"

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugarizer flatpak package

Hi Great work :) On Apr 13, 2017 12:41 PM, "Manuel Quiñones" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on a flatpak package for Sugarizer. > > Flatpak http://flatpak.org/ is the new way to distribute applications > in GNU/Linux. Is great for many reasons. One reason is that the

[Sugar-devel] Sugarizer flatpak package

Hi, I'm working on a flatpak package for Sugarizer. Flatpak http://flatpak.org/ is the new way to distribute applications in GNU/Linux. Is great for many reasons. One reason is that the same package works for any modern Linux distribution like Fedora, Debian, Arch, Ubuntu. I made the package