Hi,
I'm trying to build a sub model of a larger scenario but have run into trouble.
I have edited the original net-file with netedit and when I try to reduce the
route file to fit the new subnet like this:
python "C:/Program Files (x86)/Eclipse/Sumo/tools/route/cutRoutes.py" -v
C:/temp/SumoInp
Hello,
cutRoutes assumes that the route file contains fully specified routes (with
lists of edges) whereas your file only contains origin and destination.
To fix this, either process the route file with duarouter (giving you
fastest-routes for an empty network) or run it through sumo with option
-
?
Regards /Daniel
From: sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] On
Behalf Of Jakob Erdmann
Sent: den 7 maj 2019 12:09
To: Sumo project User discussions
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] Build sub-scenario
Hello,
cutRoutes assumes that the route file contains fully specified
ion --vehroute-output?
>
>
>
> Regards /Daniel
>
>
>
> *From:* sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *Jakob Erdmann
> *Sent:* den 7 maj 2019 12:09
> *To:* Sumo project User discussions
> *Subject:* Re: [sumo-user] B
:
/Daniel
From: sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] On
Behalf Of Jakob Erdmann
Sent: den 7 maj 2019 12:57
To: Sumo project User discussions
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] Build sub-scenario
cutRoutes does not consider the 'via' attribute. only
If your routes ha
="0.5111" tmp3="4.9532" tmp4="3" tmp5="30.2733"/>
>
> departSpeed="max">
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> /Daniel
>
>
>
> *From:* sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:
> sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] *O
discussions
Subject: Re: [sumo-user] Build sub-scenario
Yes. The format
is supported by cutRoutes.py
Am Do., 16. Mai 2019 um 14:37 Uhr schrieb Thuresson, Daniel
mailto:daniel.thuresso...@volvocars.com>>:
Is it possile to use duarouter to output a route file as below:
I managed to get dua
t;440 313 33.52 34 35
> 39 326 327 330 331[1] 336 337 40 41 342 343 346 347 " departSpeed="max"
> departLane="free" />
>
> ...
>
> For historical and practical reasons I would like to keep it in this
> format. Is this possible?
>
>
>
>
