The main difference between ACC and CACC is, that CACC behaves different if
the leader vehicle is also CACC.
>From a cursory look at their parameters, I'd say they behave different in
other situations as well. However, I'm not the model author and cannot tell
you more than you could discover yours
Thanks, Jakob for the reply. I understand that Krauss model makes full use
of it's accel/decel values.
Regarding your comment,
- ACC/CACC sometimes accelerate with less than their accel value (thereby
achieving smoother trajectories)
However, does one model accelerate more or less than the other b
The default 'accel' parameter is the same for all models (and this is
reflected in the documentation).
However, the driving dynamics still differ between the models:
- Krauss makes full use of it's default accel and decel values in almost
all traffic situations
- ACC/CACC sometimes accelerate with
Thanks, Jakob for the explanation.
To check my understanding, the default acceleration of the Krauss model is
higher than that of ACC and CACC? Is there documentation listing this?
Regards,
Royal
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:46 AM Jakob Erdmann wrote:
> The outputs are probably "valid" for the
The outputs are probably "valid" for the particular models but whether the
ACC/ CACC models conform to the behavior of any particular real life fleet
cannot be answered without prior calibration. Please also refer to my
previous answer (https://www.eclipse.org/lists/sumo-user/msg11040.html).
Obviou
Hello,
I am using average speed and waiting time per vehicle as my urban traffic
performance index. I am comparing CACC car-following model and ACC car
following models with default krauss model. I was expecting that the CACC
model will have lower waiting time and higher speed in comparison to ACC
