Re: EOT=0

1999-04-14 Thread Daniel Lee Wenger
> Hello John and everybody on this list, > I don't want to extend this discussion endlessly >, but I am surprised to read that the value of >EOT depends on longitude. Perhaps I am totally >wrong, but for me EOT is absolute. It is linked >to the motion of Earth about the Sun and has >no

Re: Error Orontii

1999-04-14 Thread Yvon Mass
Dear all, the Error Orontii is common in the gnomonic history. Pardies in his book "Deux machines propres a faires les quadrans" (1673) do it. I have also find it in the "Encyclopédie méthodique" of Panckoucke (1783-1832) at the article "Amusements de gnomonique" for the description of the Cap

Re: EOT=0

1999-04-14 Thread Jean-Paul Cornec
Hello John and everybody on this list, I don't want to extend this discussion endlessly , but I am surprised to read that the value of EOT depends on longitude. Perhaps I am totally wrong, but for me EOT is absolute. It is linked to the motion of Earth about the Sun and has nothing

Re: EOT=0

1999-04-14 Thread Jim_Cobb
Regardless of who has the best answer (and I seem to be farthest from the mean) we are talking about *very* small errors, which was what my last post was about. Here I've converted the errors to seconds of time, and you can see that they are never more than two seconds for the sampled times. I d

EOT=0

1999-04-14 Thread Patrick Powers
John, Here's another for you, though I am unsure of its accuracy! I was playing just now with the NASS Dialist's Companion and changing the date and time to find when their calculation of EoT turns to zero. For the longitude of Greenwich (and, as it happens, 52 Lat and with other corrections tu

EOT=0

1999-04-14 Thread Phil Pappas
Hello all: The reason that I inquired as to when the Equation of time equals zero is because I state in my Sundial owner's Manual that on these four days (Apr 15, Jun 14, Sep 1, and Dec 25) my sundials need no EOT correction. I realize that this statement is not entirely correct as the date whe

[Fwd: [Fwd: Name of sunlight recording device.]]

1999-04-14 Thread Tom Semadeni
Hello, Alan Nursall at: http://sciencenorth.on.ca/AboutSN/polaris/index.html provides 3 sources for conventional Campbell-Stokes instruments and a source for an electronic sunshine recorder. t -- Tom Semadeni O [EMAIL PROTECTED] o aka I (Ned) Ames . Britthome Bounty ><

Error Orontii

1999-04-14 Thread fer j. de vries
Dear all, In the article "A universal Capuchin Dial", published in the NASS bulletin "The Compendium", vol. 6, no. 1, march 1999, we ( Mac Oglesby, Bill Maddux, Warren Thom and Fer de Vries ) used the "menaeus"-construction to lay out the angles for the sun's declination. As we noted Oronce Finé

Re: Name of sunlight recording device.

1999-04-14 Thread Les Cowley
>There's a good example of the Campbell-Stokes instrument in Morpeth King >Edward VI High School weather station (Northumberland UK) - presented to >the school so not for sale. For those near Derbyshire in England, there is (or was two years ago) a Campbell-Stokes recorder in the grounds of

Re: Name of sunlight recording device.

1999-04-14 Thread Tony Moss
Malcolm Purves contributed: >I suggest this because last summer I was cleaning out a 15gal carbouy and >had placed it on a sheet of 1/2inch plywood outside and had filled it with >water to rinse, yup, you guessed, I forgot it, the sun came out, burned a >track right through the plywood and burne

RE: Name of sunlight recording device.

1999-04-14 Thread Andrew James
On 13 April 1999 16:46 Chuck O'Connell wrote ... It looks like a glass sphere held in the center of a small equatorial sundial ... following the curve of the sphere is a piece of waxpaper against a dark background. When the sun shines, the waxpaper is scorched. Anybody have a name and possibly a