Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread Roger Bailey
Hi John, Again you have posed an interesting question on intellectual property rights and protection. There are no easy answers. This field keeps millions of lawyers busy. The basic principles are easy. If you create something, it is yours. No one can copy it. The copyright is yours. There is no

Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread Ben and Maggie Hoffmann
Hello My understanding is that the US is a bit behind the rest of the world on some patent issues. One is publishing. In the US, public disclosure prohibits you from getting a patent like the rest of the world, but public disclosure is broadly defined in the US, and narrowly deifned in the res

Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread Daniel Lee Wenger
Some thoughts on patents. 1) Is the design patentable? Note that there are mechanical patents and design patents. It is more expensive and more difficult to obtain a mechanical patent. 2) Is there already an existing patent, perhaps made by the original designer or someone else? Patent searchs a

Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread Cary Chleborad
There is so much confusion about patents. There are many myths constantly circulating that just aren't true. It's not extremely expensive, the originator of the invention is the patentor (typically). There are two type of U.S. patents. etc. etc. etc If your are truly interested in learning

Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread The Shaws
The originator can not patent, as he has revealed his invention (prior art) But you can patent the improvements (not the original idea) But as Luke says - it's expensive. Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] 53.37N 3.02W Chester, UK

Re: Patents & Copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread Mr. D. Hunt
On Sun 28 Nov 1999 (08:31:30), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What should be done in this situation so that everybody wins and is > happy with the outcome? Have any of you been faced with this > situation, and what did you do to resolve it? I am not sure whether there are USA equivalents, but in

Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread John Carmichael
Hi Luke and everyone: You wrote: > As far as patenting a sundial design, >I would say don't bother. Firstly, it will cost you about $5k to file it >yourself and a lot more should you need to enforce it. I seriously doubt >any sundial designer could afford such litigation. A patent gives you a >l

Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread Gordon Uber
Just a few informal observations (not legal advice). The originator of a work has automatic copyrights even without registering it, although registration (which is easy and inexpensive) does provide additional rights (recovery of court costs, usually a prerequisite to hiring a lawyer on a co

The Universal Dialist's Companion

1999-11-28 Thread The Shaws
Fellow shadow watchers, Those of you who went to the NASS conference may recall that, during the final informal session, I gave a brief, impromptu talk on The Dialist's Companion. I happened to have taken one with me, constructed for my latitude. This generated some interest, and I was slightly s

Re: patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread Luke Coletti
John, If "prior art" can be shown then any current patent claim can be voided, this has indeed happened. As far as patenting a sundial design, I would say don't bother. Firstly, it will cost you about $5k to file it yourself and a lot more should you need to enforce it. I seriously doubt

patents & copyrights

1999-11-28 Thread John Carmichael
Hello all: Hope all you Americans had a wonderful Thanksgiving! I have been having a discussion with a fellow dialist, who wishes to remain anonymous at this point, about copyrights and patents. Maybe some of you have also wondered about this before. Here is his dilemma : Let's say you read an