Re: Polar sundials

2010-06-19 Thread Tony Moss
Tom Laidlaw wrote: Hi there, I'm trying to resolve what seems like a conflict of information. Some resources say that a vertical dial is simply a horizontal dial rotated 180 degrees. But when I used Hristov's spreadsheets the calculated angles are different. Which is correct? Or what am I

Re: Polar sundials

2010-06-19 Thread koolish
Try this experiment: Draw a circle that represents the earth and draw a vertical line through it for the polar axis. At 45 N latitude, draw the profile of a vertical dial. At 45 S, draw the profile of a horizontal dial. You will see that they are in the exact same orientation with respect to

Fwd: Re: Polar sundials

2010-06-19 Thread Frank Evans
Original Message Subject:Re: Polar sundials Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:15:53 +0100 From: Frank Evans frankev...@zooplankton.co.uk To: kool...@dickkoolish.com Greetings, fellow dialists, More universally, imagine a point on the earth's surface ninety degrees

Re: Polar sundials

2010-06-19 Thread Simon [illustratingshadows
A horizontal dial, with no longitude correction, matches a vertical dial, with no longitude correction, BUT for co-latitude. If longitude correction is added, then the correction is opposite. And the shadow moves clockwise on one, counter clockwise on the other. The attachment is only 30K, it