Re: Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-16 Thread Gordon Uber
Gordon Uber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Let's face it: The Babylonians got it right when they developed the base-60 > system. It was applied to the sixth of a circle (one sixtieth of this > being a degree) and the hour, of which we still use the first and second > minutes. Third minutes

Re: Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-16 Thread Arthur Carlson
Gordon Uber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Let's face it: The Babylonians got it right when they developed the base-60 > system. It was applied to the sixth of a circle (one sixtieth of this > being a degree) and the hour, of which we still use the first and second > minutes. Third minutes (

Re: Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-15 Thread Dave Bell
And you are quite right, Gordon! I jumped to minutes, from seconds... Something like that usually happens when I nitpick at someone else's typo! How about 5 and 24 uRad for limiting sizes? Dave On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Gordon Uber wrote: > Dave, > > You are quite correct: 17.45 mrad = 1 deg, no

Re: Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-15 Thread Gordon Uber
You are quite correct: 17.45 mrad = 1 deg, not 1 arc minute. However 4.848 microrad = 1 arc second, or approximately 5 microrad. You may be thinking of 1 arc mjnute = 0.2909 mrad Gordon At 02:13 PM 2/15/00 -0800, Dave Bell wrote: Whups! You meant a *degree* is ~17 mRadian, didn't you? An

Re: Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-15 Thread Dave Bell
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Gordon Uber wrote: > Third minutes (sixtieths of second minutes) are not in common > use, although I would note that the third minute of an hour is the period > of U.S. power main standard 60 Hz alternating current. Coincidence? Hmm... Surprised I never noticed that! Perh

Re: Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-15 Thread Gordon Uber
Let's face it: The Babylonians got it right when they developed the base-60 system. It was applied to the sixth of a circle (one sixtieth of this being a degree) and the hour, of which we still use the first and second minutes. Third minutes (sixtieths of second minutes) are not in common

Re: Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-15 Thread Jim_Cobb
Tony Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The US of course still use Queen Anne's gallon which the Imperial > system replaced with a larger unit later on. We often forget this > when comparing fuel prices. > Tony Moss I guess one could say that Queen Anne's gallon has outlived the imperial gallon

Metric v's Imperial.

2000-02-15 Thread Tony Moss
Fellow Shadow Watchers, As a teacher within the UK educational system I went entirely metric from the late 60's. If school examinations were to be exclusively metric there was no choice. Everything in Imperial Measure was ruthlessly discarded; not a rod, pole, perch, pec