John,
I am happy (though embarrassed) to report that I am now convinced
that most of the edge problems I saw in the proposal photos
were apparently artifacts. They seem to have been
introduced
into the PDF images by the compression/decompression
processes.
Perhaps some spatial periodicity aliasing was at work. There are
suspiciously moire-like patterns in panel areas, as well as less
regular
changes somehow introduced at the apparent edges.
However, this doesn't alter the bases for the calculation
of time-error vs edge-error that I posted on June 25th.
Photos did not enter into that:
>... Thus at that distance, the time required for the 1/2° degree
>wide sun to pass through the meridian plane would be very
>nearly 2 minutes of time during which it would move
>about 9.3 inches relative to the style edge. Therefore, if the
>style's edge were to be laterally displaced 3 inches, the
>resulting error in time would be about 3/9.3 x 120 = 38.7 seconds
>of time, and a 1 inch wrong location of the effective edge would
>cause nearly 13 seconds of error. ... .
which spoke to your comment:
> ..... By placing one eye at the base of a style, we could look
>straight up the edge of the styles. We did see very slight
>undulations in the styles, but we guesstimated that they were
>only between I and 3 inches, a very small amount if you consider
>the enormous size of the sundial. These could only affect the
>precision of the dial by a few seconds. Time will tell!
Indeed, time has already told me some things.
Continued best wishes for your endeavors,
Bill
|
- My Smiling Red Face William S. Maddux
- Re: My Smiling Red Face John Carmichael