RE: sundial /Jacopo de'Benci

2011-06-03 Thread Jack Aubert
Yes, it is clearly meant for a polar axis gnomon. The hour lines are symmetrical with 6 and 6 crossing at the root of the gnomon so it is meant to be directly south-facing. However the hour angle lines do not appear to be accurate for any latitude. Iif you measure the hour angles and try to ca

Re: sundial /Jacopo de'Benci

2011-06-01 Thread Frans W. Maes
I also agree, also as a mock HORIZONTAL dial. The intended latitude Phi should be related to the angle A between the 12 and 9 (or 3) hr lines as: sin(Phi) = tan (A). [For a vertical direct south dial, change sin into cos.] As A is clearly more than 45°, tan(A)>1, which is beyond the reach of th

Re: sundial /Jacopo de'Benci

2011-05-31 Thread Roger Bailey
I agree with John and Jack, this dial is suffering from gnomon dysfunction. This affects a lot of older sundials. The intended gnomon was polar, not normal (perpendicular).. Jack analyzed the hour lines and found that they are inconsistent. I did similar limited tests and agree. This sundial s

RE: sundial /Jacopo de'Benci

2011-05-31 Thread Jack Aubert
I am reposting this message that for some reason exceeded the size limit: Yes, it is clearly meant for a polar axis gnomon. The hour lines are symmetrical with 6 and 6 crossing at the root of the gnomon so it is meant to be directly south-facing. However the hour angle lines do not appea