Re: Sundial with a Second Hand

1999-05-10 Thread Bill Walton
Art Carson wrote: I agree. We are talking about very precise hour line marks, however. To be accurate to within 4 seconds of time the hole in the center of the hour line (and of course the hour line itself) must be accurate to within 1' of arc. My "free pin-hole technique" requires only

RE: Sundial with a Second Hand

1999-05-10 Thread Arthur Carlson
Bill Walton wrote: > To get the desired accuracy the "pin-holes' themselves must be very > accurately aligned (not true if the free "pin-hole" technique is used and > the hole moved back and forth until the shadow of the gnomon is centered, > and on the hour mark, at the same time) They would no

Re: Sundial with a Second Hand

1999-05-10 Thread Bill Walton
Art, Daniel, Charles, and other Dialists, I believe one could make a dial that could be read to a few seconds, however I'm not sure of why one would want to be able to read a dial at any time to this accuracy or precision. At most one might want such a dial to be able to set a watch or clock, o

Re: sundial with a second hand

1999-05-09 Thread Daniel Lee Wenger
>Discussions here and experiments of my own have established that "shadow >sharpener" techniques allow a shadow position to be read with accuracy on >the order of one second of time. This led me to look for a configuration >that allows a continuous readout with this type of accuracy, not just the

sundial with a second hand

1999-05-07 Thread Arthur Carlson
Discussions here and experiments of my own have established that "shadow sharpener" techniques allow a shadow position to be read with accuracy on the order of one second of time. This led me to look for a configuration that allows a continuous readout with this type of accuracy, not just the dete