Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-10 Thread Ceri Davies
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 09:06:20AM -0800, Kent Peacock wrote: > On 12/10/08 06:21, Ceri Davies wrote: > > We're doing that now because the docs gave me the impression that > > servers in a FOG had to have a shared VLAN. I've since seen a blog post > > (one of yours, I think) showing that this isn'

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-10 Thread Kent Peacock
On 12/10/08 06:21, Ceri Davies wrote: We're doing that now because the docs gave me the impression that servers in a FOG had to have a shared VLAN. I've since seen a blog post (one of yours, I think) showing that this isn't the case, but is such a configuration (FOG with no shared subnet) suppor

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-10 Thread Ceri Davies
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 06:03:55PM -0500, Bob Doolittle wrote: > William Yang wrote: > > Is there a benefit derived from using multicast over broadcast? And > > similarly, apart from issues with multicast on some networks, does using > > broadcast have advantages over multicast? > > > > If y

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-05 Thread Jason Jones
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Bob Doolittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William Yang wrote: >> >> Is there a benefit derived from using multicast over broadcast? And >> similarly, apart from issues with multicast on some networks, does using >> broadcast have advantages over multicast? > > If yo

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-05 Thread Bob Doolittle
William Yang wrote: Is there a benefit derived from using multicast over broadcast? And similarly, apart from issues with multicast on some networks, does using broadcast have advantages over multicast? If you have a single subnet shared by all servers, the only benefit of broadcast over mu

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-05 Thread William Yang
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "SunRay-Users mailing list" Sent: Friday, December 5, 2008 12:24:05 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly? Jason Jones wrote: > that seems to be the default if I am understanding the format of the > au

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-05 Thread Bob Doolittle
Jason Jones wrote: that seems to be the default if I am understanding the format of the auth.props file - currently in the auth.props file i see: #enableGroupManager = true Its commented out - but what is reflected in the auth.props file are the default values. Right? That's right. Nobod

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-05 Thread Jason Jones
that seems to be the default if I am understanding the format of the auth.props file - currently in the auth.props file i see: #enableGroupManager = true Its commented out - but what is reflected in the auth.props file are the default values. Right? utgstatus is all happy now too. A good indic

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-05 Thread Jason Jones
Bingo. I made this way..way..harder than it needed to be. Next time you guys get together for your weekly "how to make sun ray cooler" sessions please put me down for wanting tunable parameters like this to be pointy clicky in the admin interface... thanks guys -jj On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:09 PM,

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-05 Thread Philippe Bourdeu d'Aguerre
And be sure to have on both: enableGroupManager = true -- Philippe BOURDEU d'AGUERRE Le jeudi 04 décembre 2008, Kent Peacock a écrit : > Is multicast enabled on your switches? Try setting enableMulticast=false > in /etc/opt/SUNWut/auth.props and restart Sun Ray services to see if > that solves

Re: [SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-04 Thread Kent Peacock
Is multicast enabled on your switches? Try setting enableMulticast=false in /etc/opt/SUNWut/auth.props and restart Sun Ray services to see if that solves the problem. Kent On 12/04/08 07:10, Jason Jones wrote: I'm sure we've done something silly - but we're standing up a new SRSS 4.1 on 2 Sol

[SunRay-Users] FOG not forming properly?

2008-12-04 Thread Jason Jones
I'm sure we've done something silly - but we're standing up a new SRSS 4.1 on 2 Solaris 10 x86 u6 systems. sunray3 we want to be the primary, sunray4 we want to be the secondary. on sunray3: LAN connections: On Subnetwork: 10.0.0.0 Netmask=255.0.0.0 AuthSrvr= 10.10.