Re: runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-18 Thread Buck Evan
It would be good if that URI appeared on the runit homepage: http://smarden.org/git/runit.git On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Buck Evan wrote: > Thanks Gerrit. > > How would you like to see the layout, build process look? Maybe there's an > example project you like? > If it's easy enough for me

Re: runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-18 Thread Buck Evan
Thanks Gerrit. How would you like to see the layout, build process look? Maybe there's an example project you like? If it's easy enough for me to try, I'd like to. On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Gerrit Pape wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm around, but currently not very active in my open source activ

Re: First thoughts on s6

2015-06-18 Thread Avery Payne
On 6/18/2015 6:04 AM, Steve Litt wrote: You or somebody had better document that clearly and simply. I'm going to write up a document on the structure and contents of definition directories, as used by supervision-scripts. However, I'm going to try and approach it from an evolutionary approa

RE: runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-18 Thread James Powell
You could always craft a rudimentary Makefile, autogen.sh, and configure script set in the tree root that can be used. Then again, I like others, just do install -v XXX and cp -a to the files to directories as needed anyways, and retune to sv scan default directory in patch. Sent from my Window

runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-18 Thread Gerrit Pape
Hi all, I'm around, but currently not very active in my open source activities. runit started in 2001 and was tracked in CVS. After I took over Debian maintainership of git in 2005, I converted the repository to git. The complete history is available since then git clone http://smarden.org/gi

Re: First thoughts on s6

2015-06-18 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:32:42 -0700 Avery Payne wrote: > With yesterday's mention of the idea of a clearinghouse, the concept > that daemon options need to be versioned has been in the back of my > head. Here is an idea: versioned definitions. A crude example: > > /etc/sv/sshd/envdir/DAEMON -

RE: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-18 Thread James Byrne
Similarly, I have two patches which I submitted to the mailing list in February which I would like to get merged: http://www.mail-archive.com/supervision@list.skarnet.org/msg00500.html http://www.mail-archive.com/supervision@list.skarnet.org/msg00501.html It would be useful if Gerrit could resp