On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Buck Evan wrote:
> Apparently the 'private' keyword was added in 3.82, but many of the
> platforms I care about have older versions of make.
>
> Would you accept a patch to factor it out?
Since everything related to s6 only has runtime dependencies on the
libc (or
On 22/07/2015 15:45, Steve Litt wrote:
http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/politics_of_dependencies.htm
Yes, I had already read that, and agree with all your statements.
But it's not the same thing here, because we're talking about a
development tool. Not a dependency, not even a build-time d
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:39:31 +0200
Laurent Bercot wrote:
> And wow, my requirement is
> that the GNU make package be less than two years old, as opposed to
> eight years old.
I had no problem compiling s6, and had no dog in the fight until
reading the preceding general statement.
Here's my res