Hello!
I am Debian maintainer of `runit' supervision suite. Recently, I
received bug report [^1] about stray .u logfiles. After some
investigation I found code, that caused issue, but it seems that it was
written with some purpose, yet I fail to understand that purpose.
Author Gerrit Pape direc
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 01:39:17PM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Recently, I received bug report [^1] about stray .u logfiles. After
> some investigation I found code, that caused issue, but it seems that it
> was written with some purpose, yet I fail to understand that purpose.
>
> [^1] htt
El mar., 25 dic. 2018 a las 10:39, Dmitry Bogatov escribió:
>
> Hello!
>
> I am Debian maintainer of `runit' supervision suite. Recently, I
> received bug report [^1] about stray .u logfiles. After some
> investigation I found code, that caused issue, but it seems that it was
> written with some pu
> […] Both .u and .s files are supposed to
> be deleted when they are the oldest file in the logging directory, to
> honor 'u' lines in 'config' files, […]
Sorry, that should have read: to honor 'n' lines in 'config' files.
G.
Hi!
I'm not sure is it good idea to include .u files in usual rotation process
at all, and especially handle them just like .s files. If several crashes
happens for some reason in a short period of time this will result in
deletion of all log files except last (say) 10 .u files, which are usually
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 13:39:17 +
Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am Debian maintainer of `runit' supervision suite. Recently, I
> received bug report [^1] about stray .u logfiles. After some
> investigation I found code, that caused issue, but it seems that it
> was written with some purp
