Hi!
Thanks, this was useful reading.
Is there a migration guide from runit to s6?
If not, it might be useful to create one with hints how to rewrite
/etc/runit/{1,3} and runit services in s6-way, what to run instead of
/sbin/runit-init as kernel's init= param, and what to use instead of
Hi!
I'm not sure is it good idea to include .u files in usual rotation process
at all, and especially handle them just like .s files. If several crashes
happens for some reason in a short period of time this will result in
deletion of all log files except last (say) 10 .u files, which are usually
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 01:39:17PM +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Recently, I received bug report [^1] about stray .u logfiles. After
> some investigation I found code, that caused issue, but it seems that it
> was written with some purpose, yet I fail to understand that purpose.
>
> [^1]
Hi!
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 12:06:05PM +, John O'Meara wrote:
> While I initially didn't like the 2.4 name changes, perhaps I (and others)
I believe 2.4 was just 1st April's joke.
--
WBR, Alex.
Hi!
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 01:40:18PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> The truth of the preceding statement depends entirely on your
> priorities. If you prioritize simplicity over software orthodoxy, built
> in process ordering, and a maximally recoverable boot instance, you'll
> prefer runit. That's
Hi!
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 07:16:24PM +0200, Francisco Gómez wrote:
> Besides, if you could magically do perfect small
> applications, that means you'd have to keep working with and on
> millions of small tools, right? Wouldn't that just add up complexity!?
It depends, but in general just
Hi!
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:11:25PM +0200, Francisco Gómez wrote:
> "It's old software. Its last version is from 2014. If I have to
> choose between a dynamic, bug-filled init like Systemd and a barely
> maintained init like Runit, I'd rather use Systemd."
>
> That sounds bad,
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:58:56PM +, Kevin Burke wrote:
> Add sudo: required to your travis config file - see the doc near the top of
> the build output for info
With sudo Travis will use different build system (AFAIR - real VM,
probably KVM/qemu, instead of LXC/docker containers). I'm
Hi!
Previously Travis doesn't allow to install runit using apt (they have
custom whitelist of allowed packages), so I've used this snippet in
.travis.yml to compile it manually:
```
cache:
directories:
- /home/travis/runit
before_install:
- if [ ! -x "$HOME/runit/runsv" ]; then mkdir -p
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 02:47:29AM +0300, Alex Efros wrote:
Is it possible to run nginx under runsv supervision without breaking
nginx's ability to upgrade (SIGUSR2) gracefully without interrupting
current connections?
Looks like this workaround may solve this issue, but I'm not sure
Hi!
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 11:37:56PM -0500, Joe M wrote:
I am wondering if you have any script to log using logger (to syslog)
from a runit service. I just want to try logging to syslog instead of
using svlogd.
I don't really understand your question. If you wanna write something to
syslog
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:42:09AM -0500, Joe M wrote:
This is how I use runit on gentoo now:
https://github.com/joe9/portage/blob/master/sys-process/runit_on_openrc/runit_on_openrc-2.1.1.ebuild
Why you've moved things to /run/ - isn't it should be tmpfs in current Gentoo?
But, I am a
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:05:41PM -0500, Joe M wrote:
On a slightly different note, how do you process the svlog logs? Do
you have any related scripts that you do not mind sharing?
I don't do any advanced log rotation/backup/timestamp format change -
default features of svlogd are good
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 01:42:19AM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote:
Now granted some things are not able to be supervised such as udev on
my end. But honestly, does udev really require supervision?
Yes, it does - why wouldn't it ? Or, if it doesn't, why would any
other service ?
Any other
14 matches
Mail list logo
