Hi, version 2.2.0 of the runit package is available through
https://smarden.org/runit/
Thanks to the community, and especially to Alex Efros and Z. Liu for
recently consolidating a great set of commits, this version includes
patches from Gentoo, Debian, and Void Linux to properly build with
mode
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:19:30AM -0800, David Mountney via supervision wrote:
> The error was introduced in commit 5fe1bc773c2d979093fe4b1f3ecbbed5e6acdaf0
> "sv.c: properly format status command's output on failure cases."
>
> Where the log status is being saved to the same variable as the serv
Hi,
donations for my free software increased recently, not sure why, but
thanks.
runit upstream sources with history still are available through
$ git clone http://smarden.org/git/runit.git
Below is the diff for sv.c from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2. Possibly anyone can
spot the error and create a patch i
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 01:15:20PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> >I will be happy to send a 0/n introductory message (git send-email
> >--compose) for any future proposed series, i was not aware that was the
> >custom here. Indeed, i wrote this series because i could find no clear
> >instructions
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:10:24PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> ---
> package/CHANGES | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/package/CHANGES b/package/CHANGES
> index da4ea27..d3c419b 100644
> --- a/package/CHANGES
> +++ b/package/CHANGES
> @@ -146,7 +146,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:58:55AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Gerrit and other runit folks--
>
> I'm working on a new tool that i think would fit well with runit, and i
> was wondering if there is any interest in it as a contribution to the
> runit suite.
Hi Daniel,
I'm sure many run
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 09:02:22AM +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> Pierre Jacomet:
>
> >I did a couple of fixes to the debian package installer such that
> >the debian/ubuntu installer deals properly with the dichotomy
> >between systemd and upstart and the fact that they both may be
> >
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:43:58PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> On 18/07/2016 22:36, Pierre Jacomet wrote:
> >Hi, I apologize if this mail is a repeat as I tried to submit via the
> >web interface and I am not sure whether it succeeded or not. In any
> >case, I did a couple of fixes to the debian
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 06:24:13PM -0700, Buck Evan wrote:
> How would you like to see the layout, build process look? Maybe there's an
> example project you like?
> If it's easy enough for me to try, I'd like to.
First is moving away from slashpackage. Doing it similar to what
Laurant does in hi
27;m not the maintainer of any C code, anywhere. While I do host a mirror or
> two on bitbucket, I only do humble scripts, sorry. Gerrit is around, he's
> just a bit elusive.
>
> On 6/16/2015 9:37 AM, Buck Evan wrote:
> > I'd still like to get this merged.
> >
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:02:15AM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> On 07/11/2014 21:00, Avery Payne wrote:
> >I'm still in the process of getting a build of s6 going, mostly because I'm
> >still getting my head wrapped around the /package directory concept, and
> >getting the builds to play nice wit
Hi, transparency is a good thing. In this spirit, here're the downloads
of the runit releases from the official site http://smarden.org/runit/
from unique ip addresses for the last months
$ grep ^2014-06 @* current |grep runit-2.1.1.tar.gz |cut -d\ -f2 |uniq |wc -l
5207
$ grep ^2014-07 @* curren
Hi, version 2.1.2 of the runit package is available for through
http://smarden.org/runit/
The sv program learns the LSB init script actions reload and
try-restart. It also fixes two bugs that lead to wrong or badly
formatted output under some circumstances when reporting status of
services, and
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:55:15PM +, James Powell wrote:
> Also:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/supervision@list.skarnet.org/msg00148.html
>
> This patch was released by Gerrit a while back for logpipe error
> handling.
Hi James,
I adjusted the patch a bit as testing showed a bug. You ca
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:32:16 +
> Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:01:16PM +0200, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
> > > I was under the assumption that the pipe is left open so you can
> > > send
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:01:36PM -0700, Ryan Finnie wrote:
> This patch adds stage 4, an optional stage which is run after stage 3.
> If /etc/runit/4 is found and executable, runit will execve() into it,
> giving it control of PID 1. Finnix (http://www.finnix.org/) uses runit
> as its init syste
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:11:11PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > $ sudo sv s foo
> > run: foo: (pid 4885) 526260s; run: log: (pid 875) 526517s
> > $ sudo sv s baz
> > run: baz: (pid 2337) 2983swarning: baz: unable to open supervise/ok:
> > file does not exist
> Th
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:01:16PM +0200, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:37:47 +0100
> Laurent Bercot wrote:
> > At this point, the service is
> > dysfunctional and there's no way to recover it: so runsv should not
> > be accepting commands anymore, and close its control pipe instead
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:16:55PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
> This is a follow-up for a report sent by Mike in April. The problem
> here is that on some platforms such as OpenBSD and NetBSD, time_t has
> been enlarged to 64 bits even on ILP32. Since time_t is already used in
> the r
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:17:15AM -0700, Caleb Spare wrote:
> I suppose a workaround for us is pretty simple: if the service
> directory does not exist (initial deploy), do the rsync to a temp
> directory and mv it into place.
>
> Do you think that runsv should more gracefully handle this order o
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 12:05:24AM +0200, Felix Hummel wrote:
> I come from phusion/baseimage-docker [1] and I really like the
> simplicity of runit. It's beautiful design.
> But where is the source? Of course I could get it from the package
> repositories, but I expected a link to Github on
> http
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:44:18AM +0200, c...@webprojekty.cz wrote:
> Hello, I wrote a patch for how broken filedescriptors when creating child
> are handled. Currently only the child dies, leaving non-working instance of
> runsv in place. My patch makes it kill the parent so the runsv process can
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:16:08PM -0700, Caleb Spare wrote:
> I've been using runit for a while now and it has been mostly
> wonderful. I'm noticing a persistent issue and I'm not sure how to
> debug it.
> The problem I'm seeing is that, very occasionally, runsv will get into
> a bad state where
ut for
> other distributions.
Nice! I'd like to see runit as an alternative init system in Debian,
but there're hurdles, such as sysvinit backward compatibility I actually
don't want to see in runit.
> The only question I have left is for Gerrit Pape and that is if Runit
> i
24 matches
Mail list logo
