Hi!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:05:41PM -0500, Joe M wrote:
> On a slightly different note, how do you process the svlog logs? Do
> you have any related scripts that you do not mind sharing?
I don't do any advanced log rotation/backup/timestamp format change -
default features of svlogd are good e
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 03:31:37PM -0500, Joe M wrote:
> I thought about this approach. But, a lot of ebuilds have their
> startup/shutdown scripts catered for Openrc/systemd. I do not want to
> worry about runit support for any new package that I want to use.
Actually, it's not "a lot". On m
Hello Alex,
> > You're not the only one, but I'm using runit on Gentoo without OpenRC or
> > baselayout, all system initialization is done by /etc/runit/1 without
> > using /etc/init.d/*, and all services are started by runsv from
> > /var/service/ and also don't use /etc/init.d/* scripts.
On a s
Hello Alex,
> > This is how I use runit on gentoo now:
> > https://github.com/joe9/portage/blob/master/sys-process/runit_on_openrc/runit_on_openrc-2.1.1.ebuild
>
> Why you've moved things to /run/ - isn't it should be tmpfs in current Gentoo?
Yes, I think /run is on tmpfs. Below is from my mtab:
Hi!
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:42:09AM -0500, Joe M wrote:
> This is how I use runit on gentoo now:
> https://github.com/joe9/portage/blob/master/sys-process/runit_on_openrc/runit_on_openrc-2.1.1.ebuild
Why you've moved things to /run/ - isn't it should be tmpfs in current Gentoo?
> But, I am a
md is not
the
answer. Solutions like Runit, OpenRC, s6, and even bsdinit+perp are solutions
with
real answers to questions.
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:58:07 -0700
> From: w...@b0llix.net
> To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
> CC: joe9m...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Is runit not being
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:57:56 -0500
Joe M wrote:
>
> I read that dragora moved from runit to perp as runit was not being
> maintained.
>
> Just wanted to check if runit is not being actively maintained and if
> perp is a better option going forward.
Of course perp is a better option going forward
Assertion check:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:31:41 +
James Powell wrote:
> S6 is one of several in-development projects focusing on service
> supervision, but s6 is currently the only init ready solution with
> service supervision
All of the following projects support "init-readiness":
mini
Hello James,
I just responded to your other email.
> S6 is one of several in-development projects focusing on service
> supervision, but s6 is currently the only init ready solution with
> service supervision. It's basically, more or less, an advanced or
> expanded Runit.
This is how I use runit
From: joe9m...@gmail.com
> To: supervision@list.skarnet.org
> Subject: Re: Is runit not being maintained?
>
> Hello Laurent,
>
> > If you're looking for a similar alternative that is being actively
> > developed and enhanced, I can suggest s6 - I intend to keep workin
Hello Laurent,
> If you're looking for a similar alternative that is being actively
> developed and enhanced, I can suggest s6 - I intend to keep working on
> it for the foreseeable future, and it's currently undergoing a major
> packaging overhaul so it will be easier to install and access.
I
On 22/07/2014 22:57, Joe M wrote:
I read that dragora moved from runit to perp as runit was not being
maintained.
Just wanted to check if runit is not being actively maintained and if
perp is a better option going forward.
runit, as perp, don't need to be "actively maintained" because they
ju
Hello,
I read that dragora moved from runit to perp as runit was not being
maintained.
Just wanted to check if runit is not being actively maintained and if
perp is a better option going forward.
Thanks
Joe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
