UCSPI

2015-06-07 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
e IP port. This behaviour is similar to the > corresponding environment variables defined by CGI. Those who don't learn about UCSPI are doomed to reinvent it badly, as here. On that note, I am happy to report my discovery that GNU inetd has UCSPI-TCP support. * http://homepage.ntlworld

Re: UCSPI

2015-06-08 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 08/06/2015 01:38, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: And I am regretful and slightly hesitant to report a security bug in s6-networking, where it fails (unless I have missed something) to wipe any existing UCSPI-TCP environment variables that it isn't setting, per the spec, but merely _me

UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread fREW Schmidt
I *know* that at some point I read about an httpd (using CGI) that worked with UCSPI; anyone know where that would have been? I figure I could implement one myself but surely one already exists. -- fREW Schmidt https://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread Brian Reichert
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 09:32:45AM -0800, fREW Schmidt wrote: > I *know* that at some point I read about an httpd (using CGI) that > worked with UCSPI; anyone know where that would have been? I figure I > could implement one myself but surely one already exists. At some point,

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread fREW Schmidt
23, 2016 at 09:32:45AM -0800, fREW Schmidt wrote: > > I *know* that at some point I read about an httpd (using CGI) that > > worked with UCSPI; anyone know where that would have been? I figure I > > could implement one myself but surely one already exists. > > At some

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread Laurent Bercot
tly what I want: UCSPI support ("inetd mode"), CGI support, and a bit of easy configuration. -- Laurent

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread Wayne Marshall
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 11:33:49 -0800 fREW Schmidt wrote: > That is what I remember, but sadly: "publicfile never runs any other > programs. It does not support HTTP CGI or FTP SITE EXEC." > > I'll implement my own unless someone knows of another one that > s

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread fREW Schmidt
gt;https://cr.yp.to/publicfile.html >> > > publicfile only serves static files, it doesn't support CGI. > > I had a patch for it to implement CGI support, but it was > rather ugly. I dropped it long ago. > > I'm now using busybox httpd, which does exactly wha

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 23/01/2016 20:56, Wayne Marshall wrote: fnord is ucspi, supports cgi, and I've used it successfully in that context: I wouldn't recommend fnord. I have used it too, successfully too. But the code is not nice: little attention to error management, for instance. And fnord is also r

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread fREW Schmidt
Sadly neither of these support arbitrary http headers, which I need -- sent from a rotary phone, pardon my brevity On Jan 23, 2016 2:58 PM, "Laurent Bercot" wrote: > On 23/01/2016 20:56, Wayne Marshall wrote: > >> fnord is ucspi, supports cgi, and I've used it succ

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-23 Thread fREW Schmidt
3, 2016 2:58 PM, "Laurent Bercot" > wrote: > >> On 23/01/2016 20:56, Wayne Marshall wrote: >> >>> fnord is ucspi, supports cgi, and I've used it successfully in that >>> context: >>> >> >> I wouldn't recommend fnord. I

Re: UCSPI httpd?

2016-01-24 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
It might be worth asking what * http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2006-10/msg00770.html was all about. See also: * https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/8453 * http://people.igalia.com/aperez/bill/lib/www/http.html * http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg02065.html