El lun., 13 may. 2019 a las 14:14, multiplexd ()
escribió:
> It's been nearly two years since I set this up, so I don't recall all the
> details, but I started out with a sysvinit Debian 9 system, and
> reverse-engineered the boot sequence, which included a by-hand conversion
> of all
> the
On Mon, 13 May 2019 20:13:29 +0100
multiplexd wrote:
> All,
>
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 02:53:21AM +0200, Jeff wrote:
> > what init systems do this list's subscribers use ?
>
> I saw Guillermo's reply up-thread, so I thought I'd add my own two
> cents. My main workstation at present is a
All,
On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 02:53:21AM +0200, Jeff wrote:
> what init systems do this list's subscribers use ?
I saw Guillermo's reply up-thread, so I thought I'd add my own two cents. My
main workstation at present is a Debian 9 box booted with s6 and s6-rc, with
system setup and teardown
El jue., 2 may. 2019 a las 21:53, Jeff escribió:
>
> what init systems do this list's subscribers use ?
I have a Gentoo setup with no initramfs and one of the stable desktop
profiles (in the 'eselect profile' sense, which means GNU libc with
dynamic linking), that allows me to boot with an
thanks for the interesting links.
> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/2dx7k3/s6_skarnetorg_small_secure_supervision_software/cjxc1hj/?context=3
nice exchange of arguments.
> Do not mistake causes for consequences. Things are not correct
> because s6 does them; s6 does things because they
