Use notepad or some other editor to update your freenet.conf manually.
Once you start using the configfile manually *never* run the config
program. There are known issues with the config program at the time of
this writing.
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Michael Stather wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 22
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 10:24:08PM +0100, Michael Stather wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered 2 main poroblems trying to use freenet:
>
> 1. I?ve a router, and whatever I inser in the "ipadress" field of the
> config, I get
>
> There was an error determining this node's physical address(es).
> Plea
Hi,
I encountered 2 main poroblems trying to use freenet:
1. I´ve a router, and whatever I inser in the "ipadress" field of the
config, I get
There was an error determining this node's physical address(es).
Please make sure and are correctly set.
Note that you may put a host name in the fie
I currently went to recent logs and found another
error messages:
22:30:02Error while
receiving message [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
state [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 39ce41db06859d60:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: illegal (high) report: Infinity!java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: illegal (high)
Hi,
i went through my log and noticed that my fred
creates tons of such messages:
20.03.2003 18:13:35
(freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimator, main, NORMAL): Caught
freenet.node.rt.EstimatorFormatException: Estimate 0 under min 15 reading
tcp/12.222.124.192:26173, sessions=1, presentation
Ur, or maybe I hardcoded "freenet.log" in the viewer and never fixed it...
my bad.
> (fwiw it sounds like it isn't querying the ini file each time you click
> View Logfile - I think it's probably just querying once at startup)
>
>
>> Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too ha
In einer eMail vom Di, 16. März 2004 17:28 MEZ schreibt "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>:
>Fwolff said:
>
>>And to the philosophy of some devs: "RAM is cheap"
>>New SDRAM will be detected only with half of it's normal size or even not
>detected at all in "old" computers
>
>When I was having pro
(fwiw it sounds like it isn't querying the ini file each time you click
View Logfile - I think it's probably just querying once at startup)
> Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too hard to fix,
> I'll crack one out tonight.
>
>> I have changed the "logFile" option in the fr
Oops, that may well be a very old bug. That shouldn't be too hard to fix,
I'll crack one out tonight.
> I have changed the "logFile" option in the freenet.ini file to an other
> path. But when I click on "View Logfile ..." in the context menu of the
> blue freenet symbol, freenet.exe still shows
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:09:27AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> Using 5076 (stable) on dialup I actually retrieve a couple of files, first in
> several weeks. Still have only outgoing connections after about 30 minutes, but log
> looks much less confusing than most recent ones. 5074 actually
I have changed the "logFile" option in the freenet.ini file to an other
path. But when I click on "View Logfile ..." in the context menu of the
blue freenet symbol, freenet.exe still shows me the old unused
freenet.log in the freenet directory.
Rudi
__
Using 5076 (stable) on dialup I actually retrieve a couple of files, first in several weeks. Still have only outgoing connections after about 30 minutes, but log looks much less confusing than most recent ones. 5074 actually got icons of 4 indexes today in about 15 minutes before I down loaded
12 matches
Mail list logo
