Is it running? Has it any connections open? Does it say something bad in
the log?
/N
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 11 maj 2004 06:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-support] 5078 (Stable)
Windows XP Pro
After having Freenet disabled for a couple of weeks while I was doing some
heavy downloading I decided to fire it up again. I figured it was a good
idea to update the snapshot from 5077 first. Big mistake. Now it does
nothing. All I did was update the snapshot and download t
Perfectly normal. It should perhaps happen less than it does, but
freenet is still under development.
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:11:12PM -0700, GumpyGal wrote:
> i really can't give much more detail, it happen
> sporadically when I'm browsing freenet. sometimes it
> will give me the Couldn't Retr
i really can't give much more detail, it happen
sporadically when I'm browsing freenet. sometimes it
will give me the Couldn't Retrieve Key message several
times in a row, but I'm always able to _eventually_
load a page without reconnecting to freenet or
anything. it just slows down the process a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
vinyl1 wrote:
> Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
>
>
>>For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more
>>seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately
>>(and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side
Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied:
> For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more
> seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately
> (and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the
> browser or a FCP app) is no good idea IMHO.
"Mayb
Roger Hayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Schierl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>For me it seems as Fred is too fail-fast. It may try for a few more
>>seconds or minutes instead of returning the RNF nearly immediately
>>(and very often). Putting that retry to the user's side (being it the
>
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:58:03PM +0100, Hibbs, Phil wrote:
>
> I was a little amused to discover that the Windows installer requires me to
> click "I Agree" to the GPL screen, despite the GPL stating specifically that
> "5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed
>
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 09:52:21PM +0100, Roger Hayter wrote:
> How would you distinguish messages you don't want very much (like
> possibly non-existent Frost messages) from ones you do want a lot? It
> is likely to generate quite a lot of extra traffic to automatically
> retry all RNFs till y
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 04:20:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote:
> "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Now I believe I can live with freenet being slow and that
> >> many documents are not immediately available. What is
> >> annoying me is that _I_ will have to do the retrying. Why
I was a little amused to discover that the Windows installer requires me to
click "I Agree" to the GPL screen, despite the GPL stating specifically that
"5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed
it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribut
11 matches
Mail list logo
