RE: [freenet-support] Freenet directory sharing between Linux/windoz

2004-05-19 Thread Niklas Bergh
Or adding code to handle the situation better even... /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Guyot-Sionnest Sent: den 19 maj 2004 05:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet directory sharing between

[freenet-support] freenet crashing (with less log to get under the 40 K limit)

2004-05-19 Thread Ed Soniat
I have a freenet configuration which was working great and then it started crashing. Since it was working fine and I haven't changed anything I doubt it is the configuration file. Some times it runs for several minutes, some times several seconds. I'm on RedHat 8.0 with a 1.4.2 JVM I tried

Re: [freenet-support] mailing list subscriber email should bypass spam blockers

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:21:31AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: On Tue, 18 May 2004, Toad wrote: On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 12:53:08PM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: =20 And to further the mail objection against having to use my ISP's mailer to talk to *this* list is that

Re: [freenet-support] Snapshots

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:13:38PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems so, as if the snapshots do not get updated anymore. At least the unstable-latest.jar (or similiar, the file which gets downloaded from the update script) is still version 60103, although 60105 was already announced.

Re: [freenet-support] freenet on slashdot

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:08:22PM -0700, pineapple wrote: The paypay-freenet incident has landed on slashdot. Wonder how the website will hold up? :) The website isn't a problem, it's hosted on sourceforge. The problem with slashdot is usually that the network gets 10,000 new hosts, of which

Re: [freenet-support] Datastore loses keys on restart

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:54:28AM -0400, Daves Lists wrote: My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is set to 50 gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before and after. Were those

Re: [freenet-support] Datastore loses keys on restart

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:13:48AM +0200, TLD wrote: Daves Lists wrote: My node was up for 1 day 10 hours when I restarted it to increase the thread limit. After the restart I lost about 6000 keys. My datastore is set to 50 gigs and is no where near full. Below are the stats before and

Re: [freenet-support] error first time start freenet

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:14:36AM -0500, tripolar wrote: I am running Debian-sid, 2.6.3 kernel, and java from sun ( j2re-1_4_2_04 ). I installed freenet, edited the conf file- just added my ip address. When I started freenet $sh start-freenet.sh I get this error ( below) though this part

Re: [freenet-support] Here's the bounce reply (the list WILL block subscribers on DSL addresses running their own MTAs)

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
This shouldn't happen any more - at least, not from SORBS. On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 09:29:19AM -0700, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 18 09:25:34 2004 Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 09:24:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem MAILER-DAEMON To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet directory sharing between Linux/windoz

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
Arguably we should change the index format to not include actual pathnames. On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 10:07:48AM +0200, Niklas Bergh wrote: Or adding code to handle the situation better even... /N -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [freenet-support] freenet crashing (with less log to get under the 40 K limit)

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 09:33:50AM -0400, Ed Soniat wrote: I have a freenet configuration which was working great and then it started crashing. Since it was working fine and I haven't changed anything I doubt it is the configuration file. Some times it runs for several minutes, some times

Re: [freenet-support] Here's the bounce reply (the list WILL block subscribers on DSL addresses running their own MTAs)

2004-05-19 Thread Toad
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:30:59PM -0700, Chris Linstruth wrote: Reversing this should do the trick. SORBS.NET is way too aggressive and often out-of-date with marginal support in gettting erroneous entries removed. Spamhaus hasn't given me any problems at all. Nor has the mail-abuse.org