[freenet-support] alert

2004-06-06 Thread Robert Greenage
I received the following "Alert" while I was in the process of d/l one image that was part of a larger file. I was connected to freenet at the time. Any thoughts?     The connection was refused when attempting to contact  127.0.0.1:     ___ Support

Re: [freenet-support] alert

2004-06-06 Thread Michael R. Stork
Robert Greenage wrote: I received the following "Alert" while I was in the process of d/l one image that was part of a larger file. I was connected to freenet at the time. Any thoughts? The connection was refused when attempting to contact 127.0.0.1: Do you use a router ? I was getting

Re: [freenet-support] alert

2004-06-06 Thread Martin Scheffler
On Sunday 06 June 2004 18:51, Robert Greenage wrote: > I received the following "Alert" while I was in the process of d/l one > image that was part of a larger file. I was connected to freenet at the > time. Any thoughts? > > > The connection was refused when attempting to contact 127.0.0.1:

[freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship of Web sites

2004-06-06 Thread Nomen Nescio
First they came for the child porn sites ... http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/06/132200.shtml Blocking connections to Freenet nodes will be only a matter of time, so what should we do to prevent them from getting on

Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship of Web sites

2004-06-06 Thread freenetproject
> First they came for the child porn sites ... > http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html > Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/06/132200.shtml > > Blocking connections to Freenet nodes will be only a matter of time, > so what should we do to prevent them fro

Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship of Web sites

2004-06-06 Thread Jim Dixon
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Nomen Nescio wrote: > First they came for the child porn sites ... > http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html > Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/06/132200.shtml > > Blocking connections to Freenet nodes will be only a matter of time, >

Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship ofWeb sites

2004-06-06 Thread Nicholas Sturm
To the UK spokesman: What does "remit" actually mean over there? We use the word most commonly as in, "Please remit $10 as full payment for product, handling and shipping charges." I do understand the British and Australian English languages are very different from that used in this former colon

Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship ofWeb sites

2004-06-06 Thread MICHAEL BAKEMAN
Fuck the brits, free speach is what you make of it. Europe doesn't know what free speach is. In my opinion, this idea will be forced upon the europeans by time. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship ofWeb sites

2004-06-06 Thread Jim Dixon
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Nicholas Sturm wrote: > To the UK spokesman: What does "remit" actually mean over there? We use In this case, "area of responsibility". > But you are clear that the goal is censorship on the basis of what one > group decides is unwanted whenever that is feasible regardless