David Masover wrote:
> Takes more than 3 mins for port to start listening.
> When it does, wget reports "connection reset by peer".
what's your mainport.allowedHosts= setting, and what's the IP of the
computer you're trying to access from?
___
Suppo
***Ive been connected to the freenet project now for a little under 24
hours, though i've had to restart the demon three times in that time to
fine-tune the configuration (allowing hosts, changing to a 1.5gb local
store, and tweak the max connection limit)
***A couple problems so far.. All 4 sessi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
|
|>Unfortunately, I can't work on this at all right now. My freenet node
|>looks fine, only I get a connection close from FProxy the instant I try
|>connecting -- that is, 0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Newsbyte wrote:
| What he says may be completely FUD, but if it is true, then I don't
| think it does any good to say "Oh, but that ain't a freenet-bug, it's a
| JVM bug". That will be of little consolation to people who are using
| freenet.
I can't re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| I need the output of:
| java -version 2>&1 | head -n 1 | sed "s/java version \"\(.*\)\"/\1/"
| on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL
where the
| JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta).
1.4.1
I'm on Blackdown,
I need the output of:
java -version 2>&1 | head -n 1 | sed "s/java version \"\(.*\)\"/\1/"
on Blackdown, in order to fix the start-freenet.sh script to use NPTL where the
JVM is 1.4.2 (I have Sun 1.5.0beta).
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://fr
>If the exploit is that low level, I don't really see
how it >could work,>except perhaps by exploiting a remote execution
hole >in the host>operating system (or JVM).
Hmm..well, that may be a bit too much of
'brushing off'. Whether or not is is a fault in Freenet itself or in the JVM/OS,
u
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:33:30AM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Zenon Panoussis wrote:
> |
> | Toad wrote:
> |
> |>> The thing is, the lack of search capabilities reduces
> |>> the useability of freenet
> |
> |
> |> Of course. There are wa
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:14:49AM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>
> >Taking what you say here for granted, the entire discussion
> >up to this point is probably a meaningless exchange based
> >on some misunderstanding on my part. But what?
>
> >[URIs from logs]
>
> >>Would be inte
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:50:02PM +0200, Zenon Panoussis wrote:
> >Indeed. Thus we have NIMs, FreeMail and Frost within Freenet, and
> >outside it we have Mixmaster remailers, IIP, I2P, various kinds of
> >proxies and so on. Sadly some people use hushmail too, which is not
> >exactly the safest op
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Zenon Panoussis
> Sent: den 20 juli 2004 05:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Load
>
>
>
> I wrote:
>
> > Taking what you say here for granted, the entire discussion
11 matches
Mail list logo
