-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> So in summary, for the small file the two networks were comparable -
> 1:30ish vs 2:00ish. For the ISO, I'm not sure if there was any
> conclusion?
>
> My 2 cents: Inserts are much faster after the changes to load limiting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> So this is just an "all peers are backed off frequently after the load
> limiting changes" report?
>
> Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being
> backed off?
Well, i am not sure to tell you