[freenet-support] Convert to salted hash store NOW?

2008-11-09 Thread Ermanno Baschiera
I switched 3 days ago. The conversion took more than 48h for my 30 GB datastore on a Via C7 1.2GHz and a SATA hd. It went fine, except for the datastore that has been somehow shrinked to 24 GB (6 GB went lost?). I haven't yet tested cpu or i/o usage. This is just my experience. I hope someone has b

[freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Dennis Nezic wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:40 +0100, >> "freenetwork at web.de" wrote: >> >> Hi list, >> >> after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my >> downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface >> freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but clas

[freenet-support] Convert to salted hash store NOW?

2008-11-09 Thread bbac...@googlemail.com
I wonder if I should convert to the salted hash store now. Is it really stable? Or should I wait until more new nodes used it for some time before I convert my 'rocking-stable' old store to the new one? I mean, over the time I saw some bugs that were found sometimes later, and I don't know if the n

Re: [freenet-support] Convert to salted hash store NOW?

2008-11-09 Thread Ermanno Baschiera
I switched 3 days ago. The conversion took more than 48h for my 30 GB datastore on a Via C7 1.2GHz and a SATA hd. It went fine, except for the datastore that has been somehow shrinked to 24 GB (6 GB went lost?). I haven't yet tested cpu or i/o usage. This is just my experience. I hope someone has b

Re: [freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dennis Nezic wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:40 +0100, >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi list, >> >> after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my >> downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface >> freenet.support.compress.Compr

[freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread freenetw...@web.de
Hi list, after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected" as error message. The downloads have been started and taken over from a previous build. Now what

[freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:40 +0100, > "freenetwork at web.de" wrote: > > Hi list, > > after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my > downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface > freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected" as error > me

Re: [freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread Dennis Nezic
> On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:40 +0100, > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi list, > > after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my > downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface > freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

[freenet-support] Convert to salted hash store NOW?

2008-11-09 Thread bbackde
I wonder if I should convert to the salted hash store now. Is it really stable? Or should I wait until more new nodes used it for some time before I convert my 'rocking-stable' old store to the new one? I mean, over the time I saw some bugs that were found sometimes later, and I don't know if the n

[freenet-support] #1173: Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected

2008-11-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list, after updating to lastest mandatory build #1173 revision r23439 all my downloads are failing with "Internal error: Found interface freenet.support.compress.Compressor, but class was expected" as error message. The downloads have been started and taken over from a previous build. Now what

[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1173, 1172 and 1171

2008-11-09 Thread Matthew Toseland
ing process, which is much less disruptive to the network than UOM). -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081109/9431fde6/attachment.pgp>