Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-24 Thread Bill Shutt
Many, many thanks for all your kind help. i reinstalled Freenet which now appears to be working OK warmest regards bill > Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:54:18 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: support@freenetproject.org > Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180 >

[freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-24 Thread Juiceman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 24 November 2008 07:26, Juiceman wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat,

Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-24 Thread Juiceman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Monday 24 November 2008 07:26, Juiceman wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Juiceman wrote: >> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > >> > >> > On Sat,

[freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
Seems like we went thru this a few months > ago... yup: https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=2564 > I wonder if the old versions got put back on the website somehow? The new version of the wrapper binary is known to fix the problem??? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081124/f9b329d6/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Monday 24 November 2008 07:26, Juiceman wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Juiceman wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: > >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido > >> wrote: > >> > >>>

[freenet-support] Some bug (?) report

2008-11-24 Thread Dsoslglece
Hi, I had this message, and so I do what was asked for, and send it at one of the required addresses I think that a reason for this may have been the fact that about an hour ago, I did send two files to my editor (about 10 MB) each, and the traffic may have been a bit strangled since I've got o

[freenet-support] report

2008-11-24 Thread Ari Takalo
10 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node yo

[freenet-support] Bug report

2008-11-24 Thread toadsfriend
1 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a bug in the code. Please report it to us at the bug tracker at https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ or at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please include this message and what version of the node

[freenet-support] Sorry to have to report bad bug in 1180

2008-11-24 Thread Juiceman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Juiceman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:54:58 +0100, guido >> wrote: >> >>> Am Mittwoch, 19. November