[freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
ted your node since Saturday at midnight? Unfortunately that's now Tuesday... -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081208/3c50aac8/attachment.pgp>

Re: [freenet-support] Bug?

2008-12-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:57, Volodya wrote: Mel Charters wrote: Probably a bug: please report: 6 peers forcibly disconnected due to not acknowledging packets. 6 of your peers are having severe problems (not acknowledging packets even after 10 minutes). This is probably due to a

[freenet-support] Some thoughts and suggestions

2008-12-08 Thread Repu Blica
___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [freenet-support] Some thoughts and suggestions

2008-12-08 Thread user1
How do you know, there are no Tibetans or Iranians using the freenet - who told you that? There are other ways, than what you suggest, to use freenet! And freenet is under steady development. But good to get some suggestions, that's what makes the world rock. *smile* On Tue, 2008-12-09 at

Re: [freenet-support] Some thoughts and suggestions

2008-12-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
Firstly, you are right that to provide meaningful anonymity Freenet needs to have a lot more nodes. Secondly, there *are* freenet users from oppressive regimes. But I accept that they are few in number, despite us having an (anonymously contributed) chinese translation of the UI (we don't have

Re: [freenet-support] Java 1.4 no longer supported

2008-12-08 Thread Matthew Toseland
Try running update-java-alternatives on a console/terminal ... The most likely explanation is that you have GIJ/GCJ installed as well as the Sun JVM, and your distribution is defaulting to it for some reason. On Sunday 07 December 2008 03:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just looking at the