[freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
are > > feasible to some extent under some mostly-reasonable assumptions. Later > > versions of Freenet will make them much harder with new features e.g. > > rendezvous tunnels. > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > Shiro. > > > > > > PD. I also wonder where the cached and encrypted files on my HD are > > > gathering. > > > > In the freenet directory, generally speaking. > > > > ___ > > Support mailing list > > Support at freenetproject.org > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090106/2bbf1af1/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread user1
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 wrote: > > Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running > > steady (has been running for the last couple of days). > > > > I did following: > > [cut] > > That's an ugly[1] hack

[freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread user1
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has been running for the last couple of days). I did following: *** First I created a bash shell script "/home/user1/freenet_status_test.sh" with the following contents (please remember to make it executable):

[freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:56:48 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:51, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > So, Freemulet or Frost "automatic insertion" are dangerous? We know > > the key before the upload of the file. > > Yes IMHO. There's no such thing as a "stream of

[freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 wrote: > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 wrote: > > > Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running > > > steady (has been running for the last couple of days). > > >

[freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
es on my HD are > > gathering. > > In the freenet directory, generally speaking. > > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090106/1d707b64/attachment.html>

Re: [freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
So, Freemulet or Frost automatic insertion are dangerous? We know the key before the upload of the file. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.orgwrote: On Tuesday 23 December 2008 18:14, Shironeko wrote: Dear Freenet Support Team, I send you this message

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread user1
Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has been running for the last couple of days). I did following: *** First I created a bash shell script /home/user1/freenet_status_test.sh with the following contents (please remember to make it executable): #!/bin/bash

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has been running for the last couple of days). I did following: [cut] That's an ugly[1] hack :). And, doesn't your run.sh start a wrapper that should do

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread user1
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has been running for the last couple of days). I did following: [cut] That's an ugly[1] hack

Re: [freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:51, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: So, Freemulet or Frost automatic insertion are dangerous? We know the key before the upload of the file. Yes IMHO. On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.orgwrote: On Tuesday 23 December

Re: [freenet-support] freenet stops running

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:30:55 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009 23:19:43 Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:55:42 +0100, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote: Now my freenet on my fit-pc with 256 mb ram seems to be running steady (has been running for the last

Re: [freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:56:48 +, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:51, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: So, Freemulet or Frost automatic insertion are dangerous? We know the key before the upload of the file. Yes IMHO. There's no such thing as