etproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/1baaecac/attachment.pgp>
Ok, so this packet isn't forward to WAN by the router?
On 1/13/09, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 18:12, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
>> I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
>> port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient
I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I
have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my
computer (in opennet only)?
(mDNS protocol)
Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/41378bbe/attachment.pgp>
to all people.
>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/dfbf1933/attachment.pgp>
tps://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/a534a79c/attachment.pgp>
Target: MY COMPUTER NAME
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/1106b9a6/attachment.pgp>
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
increased by 20 percent.
With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are
backed off), often all nodes are backed off!
Peer backoff reasons
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:09:51 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > > With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
> > > increased by 20 percent.
> > >
> >
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
> increased by 20 percent.
>
> With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
> by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the
do soon
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/c616b04e/attachment.html>
fail to upgrade or notice any bugs...
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090113/84bfa
Apparently build 1196 has been pushed out; the common A new stable
version of Freenet is available message box has appeared on the message
list.
Unfortunately the Update Now button in the box only brings me to the
proxy home page and does not seem to do anything but bringing me to the
freenet
For me the manual ugrade with update.sh went smoothly and I am fully
connected (20 strangers) again on build 1196.
Are you sure you are on build 1196? (One or two peers would suggest that
you are still running build 1195.)
Peter.
Niels Egberts wrote:
Mine would not auto-upgrade either (I waited
Yeah, after about 10 minutes more peers came and now I'm also back to 20 :-)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:27 AM, SmallSister development
smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote:
For me the manual ugrade with update.sh went smoothly and I am fully
connected (20 strangers) again on build 1196.
Are you sure
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
increased by 20 percent.
With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are
backed off), often all nodes are backed off!
Peer backoff reasons
I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I
have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my
computer (in opennet only)?
(mDNS protocol)
Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 18:12, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I
have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my
computer (in opennet
Applied in SVN r25051. Will be in the next build. Thanks! Please send
translation updates to the devl list next time.
pgpKJzUtqHO5v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
On Sunday 11 January 2009 17:18, anonymous freenet wrote:
hi is there anyway to modify config via the command line? i using windows.
reasons is i want to use task scheduler to change bandwidth limit at certain
times. should i change other things besides bandwidth limit if i limit big
big? is
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
increased by 20 percent.
With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
increased by 20 percent.
With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
by 85
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:09:51 +, Matthew Toseland wrote:
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 19:02, Dennis Nezic wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:24:13 +0100, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
increased by 20 percent.
With 1196,
Freenet 0.7 build 1197 is now available, and is mandatory at midnight. Please
upgrade. Nodes with auto-deploy-update disabled may have problems, since in
1195 a bug was introduced which broke the Update Now button, which is fixed
in 1197. If you are in this situation please either update
2009/1/13 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i 3buib3s...@gmail.com:
Ok, so this packet isn't forward to WAN by the router?
Target: MY COMPUTER NAME
your computer is the target, so it seems not to do anything else but
stay home. Your IP got translated to your computer name by your
sniffer and is
25 matches
Mail list logo
