bqz69 wrote:
> I was just wondering?
> I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a
> possibly enduser of Freenet.
I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer
asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090226/335e6813/attachment.pgp>
:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090226/f2723784/attachment.pgp>
1 des noeuds auxquels vous êtes connectés ont de sérieux problèmes (données non
reconnues même après 10 minutes). Ceci est probablement dû a un bug dans le
code. Veuillez svp nous faire un rapport en utilisant le gestionnaire de bug à
l'adresse suivante : https://bugs.freenetproject.org/ ou sur
Hello
Just to warning you that freenet 0.7 doesn't run under Windows Vista Ultimate,
it deactivate my license after a blue screen death because freenet have vista
wireless drivers conflict and I have to reactivate my licencing with Microsoft
now... It's not simple as easy...
I know you
Freenet 0.7 build 1205 is now available. Please upgrade. Mostly this is
optimisations and minor bugfixes. There are also some changes related to
inserting big freesites (or librarian indexes), backported from the db4o
branch, and some minor changes.
If you find a bug, please let us know!
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 18:33:24 Michel wrote:
Hello
Just to warning you that freenet 0.7 doesn't run under Windows Vista
Ultimate, it deactivate my license after a blue screen death because freenet
have vista wireless drivers conflict and I have to reactivate my licencing
with
bqz69 wrote:
I was just wondering?
snip
I do not have any capabilities of programming myself, and is only a
possibly enduser of Freenet.
I think that about sums it up right there. Most people involved in the
project are end-users, and there seems to be only one paid and two or
three volunteer
