I've had three do this so far each with about 250 blocks to go.
The most recent was with 1295 and stalled.
It was a simple CHK@ splitfile.
I'm guessing this may be the associated error message as it's hard
to know when it occurred.
Oct 25, 2010 05:07:57:165
(freenet.support.RandomGrabArrayWith
Please upgrade, it will be mandatory on Sunday. The main change is a major
change to load management, fairness between peers. Previously, a node would
calculate how many requests it can accept on the basis that if they all
succeed, will it have enough bandwidth to transfer all the data in 90 sec
On 25/10/10 08:29, Volodya wrote:
> On 25.10.2010 10:42, Ichi wrote:
>> On 25/10/10 07:17, Volodya wrote:
>>> On 25.10.2010 8:24, Ichi wrote:
On 25/10/10 04:32, Volodya wrote:
> On 25.10.2010 6:03, Ichi wrote:
>> Is there any way to create a darknet comprising node
> On Thursday 29 July 2010 18:35:33 John R Struk wrote:
>> Support,
>>
>> I have exactly the same problem with windows XP. Tried reloading it,
>> newest release, stopping firewall and virus protection ,all to know avail.
> Uninstall and try the alpha installer. Please let me know whether it works
On Thursday 29 July 2010 18:35:33 John R Struk wrote:
> Support,
>
> I have exactly the same problem with windows XP. Tried reloading it,
> newest release, stopping firewall and virus protection ,all to know avail.
Uninstall and try the alpha installer. Please let me know whether it works.
http:
On Thursday 05 August 2010 21:31:31 PJB wrote:
> Hello Freenet Support,
>
> Trying to run Freenet. Get message: "Freenet starter was unable to control
> the Freenet system
> service. Reason: Service did not respond to signal."
>
> Freenet had been running well enough, though I must say it is aw
On Friday 06 August 2010 22:29:18 Ost-Junge wrote:
> Hallo Support,
>
> During the installation of freenet, i became the following error
> message:
>
> "Freenet starter was unable to control the freenet system service."
> Reason: "Service did not respond to signal."
>
> What do I have to do?
Pl
On Sunday 24 October 2010 20:47:22 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:47:58 +0200, Martin Nyhus wrote:
> > On Saturday 23. October 2010 19:30:18 Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:27:01 -0400, Dennis Nezic wrote:
> > > > Ok, not so obvious. How can I checkout tag build01295?
On Sunday 24 October 2010 22:05:13 Volodya wrote:
> On 24.10.2010 23:38, Daxter wrote:
> >> From my understanding, there is a fundamental flaw in p2p technologies
> >> like Freenet for those that want to deploy in highly-censored countries.
> >> That is, it's too obvious. The censor doesn't have
On Monday 25 October 2010 08:29:21 Volodya wrote:
> On 25.10.2010 10:42, Ichi wrote:
> > On 25/10/10 07:17, Volodya wrote:
> >> On 25.10.2010 8:24, Ichi wrote:
> >>> On 25/10/10 04:32, Volodya wrote:
> >>>
> On 25.10.2010 6:03, Ichi wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> > Is there any way to create
On Monday 25 October 2010 07:30:43 Volodya wrote:
> I've just refreshed the /stats/ page and i see this:
> Output Rate: 145 KiB/s (of 120 KiB/s)
>
> I would understand input being over the limit (since you can only somewhat
> control that), but output is completely under the node control isn't it
On 25.10.2010 10:42, Ichi wrote:
On 25/10/10 07:17, Volodya wrote:
On 25.10.2010 8:24, Ichi wrote:
On 25/10/10 04:32, Volodya wrote:
On 25.10.2010 6:03, Ichi wrote:
Is there any way to create a darknet comprising nodes that all see the
internet through VPN tunnels with no port forwarding
12 matches
Mail list logo
